Home Video Archives


Judge signs off on Sears bankruptcy plan
October 16, 2019

Bankrupt Sears settles dispute with retirees over life insurance benefits, setting up $3 million fund
October 4, 2019

Sears Holdings: No Pot Of Gold Waiting At The End
October 1, 2019

Betrayal of Trust
September 17, 2019

Sears Holdings Is So Broke It May Not Be Able To Exit Ch.11 Bankruptcy
September 16, 2019

Sears to start liquidation sales at these 26 stores next week
August 10, 2019

Sears Update: Retailer Looks To Settle Life Insurance Payout With Retirees For Only $135
August 1, 2019

Sears seeks to give its retirees a fraction of their life insurance benefits
July 31, 2019

Are suburbs going to allow sale of marijuana? So far more say 'no' or leaning no
July 29, 2019

Retired Sears Employees Fight for Life Insurance
June 27, 2019

COURT: Sears outlines plan settlement with UCC as judge appoints retiree committee
June 20, 2019

Can Sears Survive by Opening Smaller-Format Stores?
June 6, 2019

Sears Retirees Fight Life Insurance Termination as Heirs Get Zip
May 30, 2019

Labor Department Objects to Sears Canceling Retiree Life Insurance
May 15, 2019

DOL Puzzled By Sears' Ch. 11 Obligations To Retirees
May 10, 2019

HPS Investment Partners to Loan New Sears $800 Million/u>
May 3, 2019

Sears to liquidate and close Oakbrook Center store just 7 months after renovation
April 22, 2019

Sears sues former CEO Edward Lampert, claiming he stripped $2 billion in assets as it headed to bankruptcy
April 18, 2019

Sears will open new, smaller stores
April 5, 2019

New format Sears stores to open
April 4, 2019

Sears ends retirees' life insurance benefits
March 27, 2019

Bankruptcy Judge Pushes New Sears to Resolve Dispute With Old Company
March 21, 2019

Sears Shoppers, Workers Lament Its Demise
March 18, 2019

How Sears Lost the American Shopper
March 16, 2019

The Sale of Sears To Lampert Ain't Over Yet - Major Problems Have Developed
March 11, 2019

What's 'the real home' of Craftsman tools? It's not Sears anymore, Stanley says in lawsuit.
March 7, 2019

Stanley Black & Decker sues Sears over use of Craftsman brand
March 6, 2019

What Will Happen to All of the Vacant Sears/Kmart Boxes?
February 28, 2019

Lampert steps down as Sears chairman
February 16, 2019

Lampert completes acquisition of Sears; chain to conduct CEO search
February 12, 2019

J.C. Penney to drop major appliances after a 3-year run
February 10, 2019

Sears Just Avoided Liquidation - But Workers Have a List of Demands
February 8, 2019

Sears will stay in business; Bankruptcy Court approves Chairman Edward Lampert's plan to buy struggling retailer
February 7, 2019

Sears shares surge as bankruptcy judge OKs Lampert bid
February 7, 2019

Sears Chairman Eddie Lampert could save the brand - or doom it
February 6, 2019

Sen. Warren decries Lampert's bid to own Sears
February 1, 2019

Big Sears creditor objects to Lampert's bid
January 28, 2019

Sears Creditors Challenge Retailer's Sale to Lampert
January 25, 2019

PBGC to Pay Pension Benefits for Employees and Retirees at Sears and Kmart
January 18, 2019

Sears Holdings: You Missed The Big Short, Don't Miss The Big Long
January 17, 2019

Here's What Eddie Lampert Should Do With Sears Now
January 17, 2019

Lampert wins bid to keep Sears alive
January 16, 2019

Sears survives, what now?
January 16, 2019

Hoffman Estates on Sears' possible collapse: 'Village has survived tougher challenges'
January 9, 2019

Lampert readies higher bid to save Sears
January 9, 2019

Sears Not Liquidating Yet As Court Gives Lampert More Time For His Bid
January 9, 2019

Eddie Lampert May Have Kept Himself From Winning Sears Bid
January 8, 2019

Sears to ask bankruptcy judge for approval to liquidate: sources
January 8, 2019

Sears gets last-minute reprieve
January 8, 2019

Sears preps for possible liquidation
January 7, 2019

Sears Prepares for Possible Liquidation as ESL Bid Fails
January 6, 2019

Survival of Sears hangs by thread as bid ruling said to be delayed
January 6, 2019

Sears judgment day arrives for Lampert's last-ditch rescue
January 4, 2019

Sears believes Eddie Lampert's bid to save the company is short. Without a deal, company could liquidate
January 4, 2019

REITs with Sears exposure jump as ESL puts forth alternative proposal
January 2, 2019


Breaking News


Judge signs off on Sears bankruptcy plan
By Liz Kiesche
Seeking Alpha
October 16, 2019

A U.S. bankruptcy judge officially signs off on Sears Holdings' plan for paying remaining creditors, Bloomberg reports.

The written order approves the compromise and settlement of administrative expense claims and the treatment of the creditors' committee and ad hoc vendor group is approved.

Repayment percentage will depend in part on the amount of money, if any, that can be recovered in a lawsuit against Eddie Lampert and other managers on how they ran the retail chain before it filed for Chapter 11.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Bankrupt Sears settles dispute with retirees over life insurance benefits, setting up $3 million fund
By Lauren Zumbach
Chicago Tribune
October 4, 2019

Sears has agreed to set aside $3 million to compensate the beneficiaries of retired employees who died after the bankrupt retailer canceled their life insurance benefits in March.

Attorneys representing Hoffman Estates-based Sears Holdings and a committee of retirees presented their plan to resolve the dispute over benefits to U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Drain at a Thursday court hearing. The deal still requires official court approval, but Drain told attorneys it appeared to be "a reasonable settlement."

Sears, which filed for Chapter 11 reorganization last October, ended the roughly 29,000 retired employees' life insurance benefits shortly after selling most of its remaining assets to Transform Holdco, an entity controlled by Sears' former CEO and largest shareholder, Edward Lampert, and his hedge fund.

The company "could no longer justify paying the significant premiums for the policies," an attorney representing Sears Holdings said in a court filing.

Attorneys representing retirees argued Sears gave up the right to end the benefits in a 2001 settlement deal after the company made cuts to life insurance coverage.

The $3 million goes to beneficiaries of retirees who died after March 15, when the company canceled life insurance benefits.

Current retirees will be able to file a claim for the amount of their benefits, up to a $10,500 limit. How much they receive depends on how much money remains to pay Sears' creditors, which could be cents on the dollar, said James Lawlor, an attorney representing the retirees. Retirees should expect to receive a notice with information on filing claims.

"I think we did about as well as we could to get a good solution to the problem, which is that Sears ended up liquidating and doesn't have that much to pay anybody," he said.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Holdings: No Pot Of Gold Waiting At The End
By Elephant Analytics
Seeking Alpha
October 1, 2019


The market typically reacts reasonably quickly to new information and changes in the environment.

Past bankruptcy cases with a strong recovery for investors have involved a marked improvement in the environment and/or the disclosure of new info.

Nearly one year into Sears's bankruptcy case, there have been no disclosures that point to a strong recovery for Sears's securities.

Sears has also sold most of its assets, so asset appreciation is not going to be a catalyst.

Department store real estate isn't a great performing asset anyway.

As Sears Holdings's bankruptcy case drags on, it should be increasingly apparent that there is no pot of gold waiting at the end for Sears investors. Sears has sold most of its assets to Transformco, and given the state of mall REITs, those assets aren't becoming more valuable anyway. Legal fees are adding up, and in a best case scenario, there may be some modest return from releases.

Market Prices

Typically, when investors make out well from a bankruptcy case, the market reflects the improving outlook for the securities as it happens. For example, in General Growth Properties's (GGP) case, the disclosures from its bankruptcy filing (giving more information on the value of its properties) and an economy that was clawing its way out of recession helped served to greatly increase the market price of its securities.

The NOLs

I agree with the belief that Transformco will end up with the NOLs (Net Operating Loss) as a result of the asset purchase agreement. Eddie Lampert would have done a fair amount of work to ensure that the NOLs could be transferred to Transformco. The price action in Sears's securities also suggests that nobody following the case (at least with any substantial money) believes that owning Sears's securities will give access to the NOLs in the future.

Aside from that, NOLs are not worth as much as one might think. At the end of 2003, Coram Healthcare had $194.2 million in federal NOLs. Deloitte valued the NOLs at $32.9 million. However, the bankruptcy court noted that there was a possibility that the IRS would challenge the debtors' position with respect to how the cancellation of debt in bankruptcy would affect certain tax attributes. As a result, the court found that the risk-adjusted value of the NOLs was $10 million (5.1% of the amount of federal NOLs). This was at a time where the corporate tax rate was 35% instead of 21% as well.

Thus, we can see that the practical value of $1 billion in federal NOLs now may be only $31 million based on the lower tax rate. With no risk adjustment, $1 billion in NOLs might be worth $100 million.

Similarly, at the end of 2017, WMIH Corp. had approximately $6 billion in NOL carry forwards (which was the only thing of real value in the company). The market valued WMIH at around $180 million at the time, also suggesting that the present market value of $1 billion in NOLs is indeed around $30 million or so.

A significant reason for the relatively low valuation of NOLs involves the uncertainty of when they can actually be utilized, and this could be over a very long period of time (if at all).

For example, $1 billion in federal NOLs could translate into $210 million in tax savings. However, if that tax savings was realized evenly over a 50-year period, the PV-10 would only be $42 million.


The market is typically reasonably efficient at reacting to available information. Nearly one year into Sears's bankruptcy filing, there have been no disclosures that point to there being a pot of gold waiting for investors. The market can sometimes be too near-term focused, so a marked change in the economic environment or in commodity prices could significantly change the value of a company. There appears to be little hope of that affecting Sears's value, given that Sears has sold most of its assets to Transformco. As well, department store real estate isn't a particularly strong asset either.

Thus, the value of Sears's securities will largely only be influenced by bankruptcy court rulings (and I expect the NOLs to be transferred), legal fees, and the potential payment of releases from Lampert/ESL. It is unlikely that there will be a huge amount of value from these, so anyone expecting something like $1+ per share (as an example) in recovery is likely to be disappointed.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Betrayal of Trust
September 17, 2019








bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Holdings Is So Broke It May Not Be Able To Exit Ch.11 Bankruptcy
By WYCO Researcher
Seeking Alpha
September 16, 2019


Confirmation hearing is currently set for September 18.

Now vendors are being ask to take a huge discount on their claims that many were expecting full payment.

ESL/Lampert did not even bother to vote on the reorganization plan.

PBGC voted to accept the plan, so it is still possible for the court to confirm the plan.

The APA dispute still is not settled.

Sears Holdings may not have enough cash needed to pay certain administrative claims in order to exit Ch.11 bankruptcy. In a court filing late Friday, Sears stated they are now trying to get holders of administrative claims, which are mostly vendor claims, to take a huge "haircut" for their claims. These must be paid in order to exit Ch.11 or Sears Holdings may have to convert to Ch.7 with a trustee controlling the liquidation process. Many vendors have already sold their claims to bankruptcy claim speculators who are worried how much they will actually get paid.

The confusion over the numbers was clearly evident at a seven hour hearing on September 12, when Judge Drain gave up on determining the amount Sears Holdings and Transform (ESL/Lampert) owe each other regarding their dispute over the Asset Purchase Agreement. I expect even more confusion at the September 18 confirmation hearing in White Plains. (The hearing may take more than just one day.) At least the lawyers are making a fortune off this deal, but most investors, however, could get nothing.

Plan Voting Results

Prime Clerk filed the voting results (docket 5137) and as expected, PBGC voted to accept the plan since they negotiated their own special deal months ago. They were in their own separate class-number 3. Shareholders were not allowed to vote on the plan and were deemed to have rejected it. ESL/Lampert did not even vote. (The polite way is to say they "abstained" from voting.) Because they filed objections to the plan, lawyers decided to consider their potential votes as rejecting the plan.

Since at least one impaired voting class accepted (Class 3) the plan, the plan is confirmable under sections 1129(a)(10) and sections 1029(b) as long as the plan does not "discriminate unfairly" and is "fair and equitable" to the classes who voted to reject it. This is often called a "cram down".

Administrative Expense Claims Settlement Proposal

Cash in an amount equal to [50]% of a. the Allowed Administrative Expense Claim, minus b. [80]% of the value of the Debtors' preference actions, if any, which value shall be agreed upon by the holder of such Allowed Administrative Expense Claim, the Debtors, and the Creditors' Committee, against the holder of such Allowed Administrative Expense Claim.

Two of the strongest arguments in favor of taking such a cut is they get paid quicker. First, if the plan converts to Ch.7, it could take many more months for the Ch.7 trustee to pay these claims. Second, the Ch.7 trustee would now have to handle the 507(b) appeal. (see below) The trustee and the trustee's lawyers would be starting from scratch regarding the 507(b) issue. If the trustee lost the appeal case, it is likely the administrative claim holders would not get much, if anything for their claims.

Sears has stated that "To be clear, the Debtors are not seeking confirmation dependent on settlements with Administrative Expense Claimants". (page 6 of docket 5144). The company claims that they will have the cash to pay these claims without the settlement. They further state: "In the Debtors' view, and as the evidence demonstrates, such a settlement is "nice to have"-not a "must have." I have strong doubts about that assertion.

Most of their items Sears considers as assets/sources are under litigation, so it is impossible to accurately determine final cash available to pay various parties on the plan's effective date. There is even confusion between the court filings on Friday. Docket 5144 has ESL's obligations at $90 million while docket 5148 has it $97 million.

Because of the unsettled litigation with ESL over the APA, any estimates on current finances are very unreliable. The plan could still be confirmed if it is reasonable that the administrative expenses will be timely paid on the effective date. Sears does not have to prove that they have the cash available on the date of the confirmation hearing.

Convert to Ch.7

If the court refuses to confirm the reorganization plan because it is determined that Sears Holdings is administratively insolvent, this Ch.11 case could be converted to Ch.7 under either section 706 or section 1112. In Ch.7, under section 702, a trustee is voted for by creditors, except creditors who are insiders are not allowed to vote. ESL/Lampert would not, therefore, be allowed to vote who should be the Ch.7 trustee. Lampert "shopped" for a Ch.11 judge, but he can't "shop" for a trustee.

The trustee can select a legal staff and other professionals to help liquidate the remaining assets and to pay creditors. There would be no traditional reorganization plan confirmed by the court. It could take a very long time for the process to be completed-running up even more legal/professional fees.

Second Lien 507b Claims Denied By Judge Drain

After a highly contested hearing, Judge Drain signed an order (docket 4740) on August 5:

Pursuant to Rule 3012 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the amount of the Second-Lien Holders' claims pursuant to section 507b of the Bankruptcy Code is determined to be $0.00.

These 507(b) claims would have priority over vendor administrative claims and would have had a lien on the Winddown Account, which would have effectively made it very unlikely the holders of these vendor claims would get any recovery.

The shocking part of the ruling to some Seeking Alpha readers was that the judge included $271.1 million unused letters of credit in his determination of potential claim. The 2lien 2018 note prices plunged after the ruling from the low 20's to about 3-4. This is now under appeal before the Court for the Southern District of New York -case 19-cv-7782 VB. As I have posted in the comment area in prior articles, I did expect Judge Drain to allow any 507(b) claims nor do I expect the appeal to be successful.

September 12 APA Hearing

The Asset Purchase Agreement hearing was long and boring, but it also was insightful in that it showed how inept management at Sears and ESL caused the downfall of the retailer. For example, they had absolutely no understanding of how cash management for a large chain of retail stores worked nor did they seem to even care to learn how it worked.

After the seven hour hearing there was even less clarity how much Sears Holdings and Transform owe each other despite two very long bench decisions by Judge Drain. When asked by lawyers from both sides after one of his decisions, the judge could not give an actual figure how much was owed. This was due in part to the fact that Lampert's lawyers (Cleary, Gottlieb) were clueless about how to figure the potential damage amount after adjusting for certain changes. It was a terrible performance in court by a respected law firm.

There still are a number of contested APA issues not resolved after the hearing. It is not clear when they will be resolved. In theory, they could be resolved at the confirmation hearing. (I will post my other opinions about this APA hearing in comment section below.)

Impact on Investors

Shareholders might want the case to remain Ch.11 hoping that some type of last minute negotiations would result in SHLDQ shareholders getting paid for releases under an amended Ch.11 plan. Currently, ESL/Lampert are not covered under releases because the Restructuring Committee would rather bring litigation for damages in court. Releases are not part of the Ch.7 process. (Note: I think SHLDQ shareholders would be more certain of at least a token recovery sooner under negotiated releases with Lampert than wait many years under the Restructuring Committee approach.)

Holders of the 2lien 2018 notes most likely would hope that Sears has to convert to Ch.7 because the trustee's defense in court against the appeal of the 507(b) claim might not be as strong as if it were done by Sears' lawyers who are more familiar with the issues. This could explain why the price of the notes has increased from about 3-4 to 7-8 as investors factored in the increasing potential Ch.7 conversion into their valuations.

Option traders are watching a potential conversion to Ch.7 because it would almost certainly mean the SHLDQ shares would not be cancelled prior to January 2020 expiration date and would continue to trade. If they stay in Ch.11 they might be able to declare their plan effective and cancel the shares prior to January 2020, but it is still uncertain if they can get the liquidity needed within the next few months to do this.


This bankruptcy case is far from over. Legal and professional fees could approach $200 million by time the entire process, including future litigation, is completed. At the same time SHLDQ shareholders and noteholders are getting nothing. In my opinion, many stakeholders would be getting more recovery if this began as a Ch. 7 bankruptcy case instead of Ch.11.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears to start liquidation sales at these 26 stores next week
By Tonya Garcia and Tomi Kilgore
Market Watch
August 10, 2019

Store closings include 5 Kmart stores in 3 states and Puerto Rico and 21 large-format Sears stores in 15 states

Transform Holdco, the company formed in January to buy the remaining assets of bankrupt retailer Sears Holdings Corp., said it will begin "liquidation sales" next week in 26 stores that will close in late October.

The large-format store closures include 21 Sears stores in 15 states and 5 Kmart stores in 3 states and Puerto Rico.

"After careful review of where we are today, we believe the right course for the company is to accelerate the expansion of our smaller store formats which includes opening additional Home & Life stores and adding several hundred Sears Hometown stores after the Sears Hometown and Outlet transaction closes," Transform Holdco said in a statement. "Following these steps, we will continue to evaluate our network of Sears and Kmart stores and cannot rule out additional store closures in the near term."

Transform Holdco had made a bid to buy all of the Sears Hometown & Outlet Store stock that wasn't already owned by former Sears Chief Executive Eddie Lampert's hedge fund, ESL Investments Inc. and its affiliates.

Shares of Sears SHLDQ, +0.57%, which filed for bankruptcy in October 2018, have tumbled 36.6% year to date through Thursday and 68.2% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the SPDR S&P Retail exchange-traded fund XRT, -2.26% has gained 0.3% this year and the S&P 500 index SPX, -0.66% has advanced 17.2%.

Here's where the stores that are closing are located:

Kmart 1625 W Redlands Redlands CA
Kmart 14011 Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs CA
Kmart 159 Wilbraham Rd Palmer MA
Kmart 975 Fairmount Ave Jamestown NY
Kmart Hwy 3 Plaza Guayama Guayama Puerto Rico
Sears* 2500 Riverchase Galleria Birmingham AL
Sears* Somersville Rd Antioch CA
Sears* 9501 W Bowles Ave Littleton CO
Sears* 6200 20th St Vero Beach FL
Sears* 901 US 27N Sebring FL
Sears* 3700 Atlanta Hwy Ste 270 Athens GA
Sears* 5 Stratford Square Bloomingdale IL
Sears* 2300 Southlake Mall Merrillville IN
Sears* 6501 Grape Rd US 23 Mishawaka IN
Sears* 6901 Security Sq. Blvd Baltimore MD
Sears* 6780 S Westnedge Ave Portage MI
Sears* 4900 Fashion Square Mall Saginaw MI
Sears* 18777 E 39th St S Independence MO
Sears* 3 Mid Rivers Mall Dr St. Peters MO
Sears 330 Siemers Dr Cape Girardeau MO
Sears* 600 Richland Mall Mansfield OH
Sears* 1101 Melbourne Rd Hurst TX
Sears* 10000 Emmet F Lowry Expy Texas City TX
Sears* 4812 Valley View Blvd NE Roanoke VA
Sears* 4700 N Division St Spokane WA
Sears* 100 Huntington Mall Rd Barboursville WV
* The Sears Auto Centers at these stores will close in late August

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Update: Retailer Looks To Settle Life Insurance Payout With Retirees For Only $135
By Brinkwire
August 1, 2019

Following Sears Holdings Corp.'s (SHLDQ) Chapter 11 bankruptcy last year, the company's retirees are finding their life insurance plan cut short. The retired Sears workers saw their life insurance plan terminated earlier this year, which Sears is now reportedly is looking to settle with a $135 payment each.

The offer from Sears comes after it sold its stores and most of its assets to Eddie Lambert's hedge fund, ELS Investments in January. The Sear's estate is now responsible for paying the company's old debt, which also includes the life insurance plan for about 29,000 former employees, Bloomberg reported.

The life insurance plan has a value of $5,000 to $14,500 in death benefits for the former Sears workers, according to a court filing, with about a dozen retirees holding from $356,000 to $2.7 million in death benefits. With Sears' proposed plan, the employees may only see 2.3 to 2.7 percent of their death benefits, which could amount to $115 to $135, the court filing said.

"The new plan is totally unacceptable to the retirees," Ronald Olbrysh, chairman of the National Association of Retired Sears Employees told the news outlet. "It's totally unfair, what Sears is attempting to do."

Sears' estate terminated the retiree plan back in March, giving employees the option to move to an individual life insurance policy at their own cost. The retirees were granted a committee to advocate for their interests by a federal judge in June. A hearing on the proposal is scheduled for Aug. 12.

Shares of Sears stock were down 2.93 percent as of 10:25 a.m. ET on Wednesday.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears seeks to give its retirees a fraction of their life insurance benefits
By Sarah D. Young
Consumer Affairs
July 31, 2019

Former workers with death benefits between $5,000 and $14,500 could receive just $135 under the plan

Sears retirees who had life insurance coverage through the company may now receive just $135 each from the now-bankrupt retailer, Bloomberg reports.

About 29,000 former Sears employees had a life insurance plan through the company, which sold its stores and most of its assets to chairman Eddie Lampert's hedge fund, ESL Investments, back in January.

In March, Sears canceled its workers' life insurance plan and gave them the option to pay for their own life insurance. The terminated plan would have provided death benefits of between $5,000 and $14,500 for workers, but the company now says it doesn't have enough money to pay the full amount.

Sears has laid out a new plan that would drastically reduce the amount of money its retirees will receive. Former Sears employees who were slated to receive thousands in benefits could now receive just $115 to $135, according to a court filing.

"The new plan is totally unacceptable to the retirees," Ronald Olbrysh, chairman of the National Association of Retired Sears Employees, told Bloomberg. "It's totally unfair, what Sears is attempting to do."

A hearing on the proposal is set for August 12.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Are suburbs going to allow sale of marijuana? So far more say 'no' or leaning no
By Elena Ferrarin
Daily Herald
July 29, 2019

The effort to legalize recreational marijuana in Illinois was a hot and, at times, divisive topic for months, with opposition from law enforcement and ultimately bipartisan support from the state legislature.

Now, it's the suburbs' turn.

Elected officials in towns big and small are starting to decide if they want to open the doors to marijuana sales in their towns -- and, so far, more are saying "no," or leaning that way.

Naperville, Lake Barrington and Bloomingdale plan to officially ban sales, Libertyville leans toward the same and the mayor of Batavia said he will issue a veto if necessary.

Des Plaines officials have expressed concerns and are doing more research before deciding, which also will happen in Lincolnshire and Bartlett.

To date, only South Elgin and Elburn said they are OK with allowing one marijuana retail store.

Despite this early negativity, bill sponsors say they aren't worried about having enough communities throughout the state that will allow marijuana sales and meet estimates that it will generate hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenues and licensing fees.

"I think you're always going to hear the negative first. I don't necessarily think this is indicative of anything," said State. Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Democrat from Chicago. "I am hearing from a lot of communities that want to know more, that want to get model ordinances from us and ideas of how best to implement it. I think folks are doing their best due diligence on both sides."

However, Naperville Councilman Kevin Coyne, who led the effort to prevent the sale of recreational marijuana in the city, said he believes more municipalities will say "no."

"I do feel this should not belong in the suburbs," Coyne said.

The main concerns are a potential increase in traffic crashes, use among teens and consumption of harder drugs, Coyne said. If none of that pans out, he's open to revisiting the issue in the future, he said.

"There are people who say they simply don't agree marijuana is harmful," Coyne said. "I'm not willing to ignore the opinions of many experts."

In Lake Barrington, Village Administrator Karen Daulton Lange said the board wants to preserve the village as a quiet community.

"Our residents have made it very clear that their desire is to maintain a peaceful atmosphere," she said. "I don't think our residents see marijuana sales as consistent with that atmosphere."

But South Elgin Village President Steve Ward said it's all about being realistic and having local control.

"It's going to be legal, so why should we step aside?" he said. "I know it's not a great thing. But we've come a long way in the world, and marijuana is not the worst thing in the world. To me, it's no different than alcohol."

Elburn Village President Jeff Walter agreed. "If someone wants to invest in Elburn with that kind of shop and it's legal, they can invest."

Walter also pointed out that Elburn and other suburbs at first shunned video gambling, which went live in 2012, then gradually changed their minds as surrounding communities allowed it.

The possession and consumption of cannabis by people 21 and over, currently legal in 10 states, will be legal in Illinois starting Jan. 1. The state will issue up to 75 retail dispensary licenses, including 47 in the Chicago metro area, before May 1. Existing medical cannabis dispensaries can apply for early approval licenses to either sell recreational marijuana on site or at a different location. Up to 110 licenses will be available by December 2021.

The Illinois Department of Revenue projects recreational marijuana, including sellers and growers, will generate more than $57 million in tax revenues and licensing fees this fiscal year. Tax revenues will generate $140.5 million in 2021 and gradually increase to $375.5 million in 2024, estimates say. Those projections are based on population and usage rates, Cassidy said.

Municipalities can choose to not allow marijuana stores within their boundaries, or can enact "reasonable" zoning ordinances and regulate how many and where they are located. That can include minimum distances from "sensitive" locations such as colleges and universities, the law states.

Marijuana retail locations cannot be placed within 1,500 feet of each other and advertisement is prohibited within 1,000 feet of school grounds, parks and playgrounds, recreation and child care centers, public libraries, and game arcades with people under 21.

The discussions held by suburban elected officials mostly have been prompted by staff members, some of whom, such as in South Elgin, have fielded calls from people interested in opening marijuana businesses.

Arlington Heights staff members said they also got calls and are gathering information to present to the board, possibly next month. "We may present some different alternatives, and they will discuss what they want to do with it," said Robin Ward, in-house counsel for the village. "It's definitely one of those subjects we need board direction."

In Des Plaines, council members said they want to know exactly what the law allows municipalities to regulate before making a decision, City Manager Mike Bartholomew said.

In Libertyville, the village board directed the plan commission to hold a public hearing Aug. 26 about possible zoning changes related to marijuana sales. Bartlett's village board directed staff to research how comparably sized communities have regulated marijuana sales in states where it's legal, and what public health and safety impacts they've seen.

A total 8% of state revenues from marijuana will be distributed among local governments on a per capita basis to support law enforcement and prevention of illegal sales and driving under the influence of cannabis. Municipalities that allow marijuana sales can impose local sales taxes up to 3%.

Elburn's village president said he favors funding parks and recreation with some of those revenues; South Elgin's village president said the money might be allocated to the police department.

Bloomingdale Village Trustee Frank Bucaro said he's perfectly OK not getting additional revenues because he believes recreational marijuana will bring about a slew of negative consequences, particularly for youth.

"How do you put a dollar amount on that?" Bucaro said.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Retired Sears Employees Fight for Life Insurance
By Lauren Zumbach
Chicago Tribune
June 27, 2019

Retailer claims settlement changes were never official and that it had the right to end benefits of 29,000 former workers

The judge overseeing Sears Holdings' bankruptcy is giving 29,000 retired employees a chance to fight for the life insurance benefits they lost when the retailer canceled their coverage earlier this year.

This week, US Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Drain directed the US trustee overseeing the case to appoint a committee representing retirees.

Sears ended the retirees' life insurance benefits in March, shortly after selling most of its remaining assets to Transform Holdco, an entity controlled by Sears' former CEO and largest shareholder, Edward Lampert, and his hedge fund.

As of March 15, about 29,000 retirees had coverage with death benefits worth between $5,000 and $14,500 that cost Sears $1.3 million in monthly premiums, Sears said.

"The Debtors determined that, given the financial circumstances of their estates, they could no longer justify paying the significiant premiums for the policies," an attorney representing Sears Holdings said in a court filing.

Attorneys representing two retirees who pushed for the committee's creation have argued that the company gave up the right to end the life insurance benefits as part of a settlement agreement reached in 2001, after the company made cuts to life insurance coverage.

But Sears said the changes agreed to in the settlement were never made official and that it had the right to end the benefits, according to court filings.

A committee representing Sears' unsecured creditors also objected to the retirees' request, citing Sears' limited remaining funds. In a court filing, Sears said unsecured creditors are expected to receive 2.3 to 2.7% of what they claim they're owed.

Retired eployees who purchased replacement life insurance after Sears canceled coverage may have a claim, as might beneficiaries of retirees who died after the life insurance benefits ended in March, said Michael Mulder, an attorney representing the retirees.

"We know there are people out there's that's happened to," he said.

A dozen former senior executives still have life insurance benefits worth between $356,080 and $2.7 million. Allstate, which covered the former executives but not the larger group of workers, agreed to extend the policy's grace period at no cost to Sears while the companies worked to give the retirees a way to maintain coverage at their own cost, Sears said in the filing.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

COURT: Sears outlines plan settlement with UCC as judge appoints retiree committee
By Taylor Harrison
June 20, 2019

Sears Holdings Corporation has reached terms for a settlement that will see its unsecured creditors committee (UCC) support approval of its liquidation plan, a debtor attorney told the court during a hearing today. The company's bankruptcy judge also agreed to appoint an official retiree committee during the hearing, despite opposition from the debtors.

Debtor attorney Ray Schrock, of Weil Gotshal & Manges, said the agreement is a "very important" development in the case. Under the deal, there will now be five members on a liquidating trust board rather than a previously contemplated three. The UCC will choose three of the five members, Schrock said. He noted that there is an anticipated USD 25m that will likely go into the trust, but that is not a condition to the deal.

"This was not easy but it was well worth it," Schrock said.

He added that negotiations with the UCC led to a delay in the process of soliciting the disclosure statement, which was approved on 29 May. But despite the delay, Schrock said the deal will still result in "immense" savings as the company won't have to litigate with the UCC.

Judge Robert Drain of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York said this was "obviously" a positive development. He said the debtors won't have to submit a new disclosure statement for approval since the deal doesn't change the economic terms of the plan.

Though the resolution will provide the debtors with a smoother path toward approval of their liquidation plan, it doesn't resolve opposition from former Sears CEO Eddie Lampert's ESL Investments. ESL Investments bought Sears' remaining operating assets earlier this year for USD 5.2bn. Transform Holdco LLC, a unit of ESL, sued the Sears estate in May for allegedly failing to deliver hundreds of millions of dollars of assets outlined in the sales agreement.

Also at today's hearing, Judge Drain agreed to appoint an official retiree committee, despite an objection from the debtors and a joinder from the UCC.

In May, retirees Richard Bruce and Ronald Olbrysh filed a motion seeking the appointment, as representatives for tens of thousands of retirees. They asserted that they are entitled to life insurance benefits under a plan that has been in place for decades. In 1997, after Sears attempted to ter minate the plan, retirees brought a class action so that the company couldn't do away with the benefit plan or modify it, according to the motion. In 2001, Sears entered into a settlement agreeing not to modify or terminate the life insurance plan, which vested the benefit rights permanently, the retirees asserted.

James Lawlor of Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch, representing Bruce and Olbrysh, said during the hearing that the debtors have now terminated the retiree benefits, despite their prior agreement not to do so. He noted that the retirees the motion is specifically referencing were Sears employees prior to 1977, which are entitled to relief under the class action. Subsequent retirees don't fall into the class.

Lawlor said that due to the debtors' termination, there are 80-year-old retirees now having to try and find a way to replace their benefits. Lawlor said if the benefits haven't been properly terminated, the retirees are entitled to administrative expense claims. But there is no mechanism in place or notice provided to inform them of those potential claim rights, he said. Lawlor asserted that having a committee to represent the retirees would resolve that issue.

Debtor attorney Jacqueline Marcus, of Weil Gotshal, said the debtors attempted to get the buyer of their operating assets to assume the retiree benefit obligations, but to no avail. She said the decision to terminate the benefits was "certainly a difficult one," but the payments make up a "huge" number that the debtors can't pay.

Marcus said the debtors' point of view is that the committee doesn't make sense in the context of the cases, which are in liquidation mode.

Judge Drain decided that a committee should be appointed, saying the US Trustee will promptly form one. However, he did limit the committee to a USD 250,000 budget as a "reality check."

Sears filed for bankruptcy protection in October 2018 with plans to close 142 underperforming locations and sell the rest of its stores.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Can Sears Survive by Opening Smaller-Format Stores?
By Liz Wolf
National Real Estate Investor
June 6, 2019

Amid bankruptcy, lawsuits and uncertainty, Eddie Lampert and ESL are trying to revamp the chain with small-format stores.

It has been a tumultuous situation ever since Eddie Lampert, former Sears Holdings Corp. CEO, and his ESL Investment Inc. hedge fund gained control of Sears in February, in an effort to give the iconic retailer a second chance.

Earlier this year, Lampert and ESL said the $5.2 billion deal to acquire the company would save 425 stores and approximately 45,000 jobs. Sears Holdings, which owned Sears and Kmart, filed for bankruptcy protection last October. The retailer has closed hundreds of stores in the past several years.

Now, the former holding company for Sears is suing Lampert and the company he formed to operate the "new Sears"-called Transform Holdco LLC-alleging that he "stripped assets and left it broke," as the retail chain spiraled into bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported.

In turn, Lampert and Transform are suing the "old Sears," claiming violation of the sales agreement. Adding even more turmoil, Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently criticized Lampert for backing out on his promise to pay severance to former Sears and Kmart employees who lost their jobs following the bankruptcy, Bloomberg reported. As part of the terms of the deal to acquire the bankrupt chain through Transform, Lampert said he would cover those payments. (Here's the letter Warren and Ocasio-Cortez wrote to Lampert).

And the saga continues as just this week the New York Post reported that Sears' suppliers have been "caught between the bankrupt retailer and Eddie Lampert," and the bankruptcy has "burned thousands of vendors."

Despite turmoil, what's next for Sears?

Outside of the court battles, the former retail giant is working to revitalize and reinvent the Sears brand and try to make it relevant in today's changing retail environment.

That likely won't be an easy task as bricks-and-mortar retail continues to flail. In fact, 7,215 store closures have already been announced by U.S. retailers in 2019, according to global market research firm Coresight Research. Coresight estimates that announced U.S. store closures could reach 12,000 by the end of 2019.

In an effort to stage a comeback, Sears unveiled a new, small-format store called Sears Home & Life. Three locations are now open in Overland Park, Kan.; Lafayette, La., and Anchorage, Alaska. The new stores will typically be around 10,000 to 15,000 sq. ft., which is significantly smaller than Sears' traditional stores, which are in the 150,000-sq.-ft. range. (The Anchorage store is only 7,500 sq. ft).

The concept won't carry any apparel, but instead will sell major and small kitchen appliances, tools, mattresses and home services.

"We've been listening to our customers [and they ] have told us they want our best categories—appliances, smart products and our Home Services offering," said Peter Boutros, chief brand officer for Sears and Kmart, in a statement.

Shoppers can meet with experts to explore how new appliances will look in their kitchens. The new stores will also provide "Sears Search Bar" kiosks, where customers can order all products available online from Kmart and Sears and have them delivered to their home or store.

The new Home & Life stores carry Sears' signature brands like Kenmore, Craftsman and DieHard, as well as additional major brands like Sealy, Serta and Tempur-Pedic.

Stores will also offer an assortment of smart products where shoppers can learn how to set up a smart home with appliances that are compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant. These will include smart speakers, video doorbells, smart bulbs, smart thermostats, alarm systems and cameras, a company spokesperson told NREI.

The company hasn't disclosed how many more Sears Home & Life stores are in the works or where they'll open. The three already-opened locations are in neighborhood shopping centers where the company has leased space.

"We have other locations identified; however, we cannot share details at this time," the spokesperson says. "Our target demographics are young-forming families and boomers in vibrant communities, which we've gathered from customer and member data based on our product and brand focus."

Through these new concepts, the company is reinvigorating the Sears name, the spokesperson adds.

"We want to make sure we're integrating key aspects of our legacy, while still emphasizing our move into the future," he notes. "We're confident we've found a sweet spot and our shoppers will be pleased. One challenge has been finding available real estate in the markets where we want to locate."

Will a slimmed-down footprint draw shoppers and help Sears be more competitive?

Sears faces growing competition from retailers like Walmart, Home Depot and Best Buy, as well as Amazon and other online players, and the question is whether it's doing enough to differentiate itself.

"The smaller concept is a logical move as it is designed to reduce the cost of running stores by focusing on Sears' stronger categories such as appliances and beds," says Neil Saunders, managing director at research firm GlobalData Retail. "However, there are a lot of question marks over whether the new concept will work."

The brand name has now been tarnished by years of underinvestment and the bankruptcy filing and opening new stores won't do much to undo that level of damage, he adds. "It is also the case that while the new smaller stores look better than the old department stores, what they stock and how they sell it is not unique, so they still face a lot of competition from other players in the market. This includes the drive to online, which is becoming ever more important."

Saunders notes the biggest challenge for Sears is whether it can differentiate itself and ditch the baggage of the old business. "Leadership proved itself unworthy of that challenge in the old business, so there is nothing to suggest they will engineer a better outcome as they try to rebuild."

Customers trust in the company has been damaged, notes Stefanie Meyer, senior vice president and principal at retail real estate brokerage Mid-America Real Estate - Minnesota LLC. She also says there will be many landlords who are not willing to take the risk in leasing to Sears. Landlords who are struggling to fill space, however, would be glad to lease to them, because they don't have a lot of choices, she adds.

Transform to acquire remaining Sears Hometown and Outlet stores

In yet another chapter to the story, Transform—the now-parent company of Sears and Kmart—announced it will buy the rest of the Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores that it doesn't already own and reunite the businesses with its Sears and Kmart stores. Sears Hometown was spun off from Sears Holdings in 2012.

Transform will pay $2.25 a share in cash. ESL Investments and its affiliates-the majority owners of Transform-currently hold 58 percent of the outstanding shares of Sears Hometown.

Company officials say having these businesses under one ownership will accelerate Transform's strategy of growing its smaller-store format. The deal will "expand the company's footprint as a multi-channel business" that can serve customers through a variety of shopping experiences, they note.

"We believe that reuniting our Sears Hometown segment stores with Transforms Sears full-line stores will result in a more consistent customer experience across Sears branded storefronts, generate higher total revenues and leverage efficiencies of scale to improve costs and margins, all of which could lead to improved profitability for Sears Hometown's dealers and franchisees," said Will Powell, CEO and president of Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, in a statement.

Under the terms of the agreement with Transform, Sears Hometown has the option to sell its Sears Outlet and Buddy's Home Furnishing Stores (together, the "Outlet Segment") for no less than $97.5 million and the sale must close by Oct. 23.

Sears Hometown operates 491 Hometown stores and 126 Outlet stores. The deal is anticipated to close in November.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Retirees Fight Life Insurance Termination as Heirs Get Zip
By Josh Saul
May 30, 2019

• Shell of bankrupt retailer terminated life insurance policies

• U.S. Department of Labor earlier objected to Sears estate move

A group of retired Sears Holdings Corp. workers have asked for the creation of a committee to protect their interests as a retiree died shortly after his life insurance was canceled.

Lawyers for the retired workers say the bankrupt retailer has wrongly terminated the life insurance policies for tens of thousands of former employees. They believe the spouses of some Sears retirees who recently died have been deprived of the life insurance payment earned from years of work at the iconic department store, according to a court filing. In one instance, the life insurance policy of a Sears retiree who died May 6 won't be paid because his death was 21 days after the Sears estate terminated his benefits, according to the Tuesday court filing.

"Sears has stated its clear intention to ignore its obligations to the retirees," states the motion to form a committee. "The retirees request that the court direct the appointment of a committee to advocate for the thousands of retirees unjustly and illegally losing their benefits."

Sears filed for bankruptcy last year and sold its assets in January. The shell of the business that is now winding down with a plan to pay creditors said in an April court filing that it had stopped making premium payments and had terminated the retiree plan. The U.S. Department of Labor objected earlier this month to the estate plan to end the life insurance without court approval, but the estate responded that it has the right to "unilaterally amend or terminate the plan at any time."

"It came as really a shock that they would do that, because that was the last benefit we had," said Ronald Olbrysh, one of the Sears retirees asking for the committee. Olbrysh said that many Sears retirees dropped their existing life insurance policies in favor of a company policy. "That was a mistake, but they relied on Sears."

The fight over life insurance comes amid a number of other conflicts in the bankruptcy. Eddie Lampert, ex-Sears chief executive officer and founder of the investment firm that bought the company's assets, sued the estate on Saturday for failing to deliver "hundreds of millions of dollars of assets" in accordance with the sales agreement.

Lampert says that the estate's failure to deliver assets means he shouldn't have to pay $43 million in severance payments to workers who lost their jobs. ESL representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the severance issue. Lampert's lawsuit followed one filed against him by the Sears estate that accused him of wrongly transferring $2 billion of company assets beyond the reach of creditors in the years before bankruptcy.

Olbrysh is also the chairman of the National Association of Retired Sears Employees, which notified its membership earlier this year when the life insurance policies were terminated. "As a result of the life insurance cancellation, Olbrysh received an average of twenty phone calls per day from retirees," according to a court filing.

The case is Sears Holdings Corp., 18-23538, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York (White Plains).

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Labor Department Objects to Sears Canceling Retiree Life Insurance
By Soma Biswas
WSJ PRO Bankruptcy
May 15, 2019

Government questions retailer's right to cancel the program in light of a 2001 settlement with retirees

A bankruptcy court will take up the U.S. Labor Department's objection to Sears Holdings Corp.'s cancellation of retirees' life insurance.

The Labor Department is questioning the Sears bankruptcy estate's right to unilaterally cancel the life insurance program for retirees in light of a 2001 settlement and is scheduled to face off with the retailer at a hearing on Thursday.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

DOL Puzzled By Sears' Ch. 11 Obligations To Retirees
By Alex Wolf
May 10, 2019

U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta asked bankrupt retail giant Sears Holdings Corp. on Wednesday to explain contradictions in its pending Chapter 11 plan regarding the treatment of retiree benefits for some 80,000 former employees.

Before Sears Holdings can solicit creditor votes on its plan to dissolve in Chapter 11 and put its assets in a liquidating trust, the company needs to reconcile confusing statements about how it intends to treat a legacy retiree life insurance plan, lawyers for Acosta said in an objection.

The secretary's filing points to a set of paragraphs in the debtors' disclosure statement that informs creditors that the company's board approved the termination of the retiree plan in March, with legal authority to do so in the event of a corporate reorganization, but then states that Sears Roebuck entered into a legal settlement in 2001 agreeing not to “reduce or terminate the applicable retiree coverage."

"The debtors have failed to disclose in the disclosure statement what they intend to do in light of this conflict," Acosta said, asking if the Sears estate intends to restore the benefits. He also urged the company to explain how it will satisfy pension obligations that must carry through in a Chapter 11 plan.

"Consequently, will the amount of claims by vested retirees under the Retiree Life Insurance Plan alter the disclosure statement's estimate of administrative expenses?" he asked.

For their part, lawyers for Sears Holdings stated in the disclosure statement filed last month that they became aware of the 2001 settlement stipulation after the March termination and “have not been able to identify any such amendment to the applicable plan.” They also don't have information with respect to retirees covered by the stipulation, they said.

A representative for Sears Holdings did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday evening.

The issue identified by the secretary's office refers to a settlement reached in Illinois federal court by Sears to resolve a class action suit that challenged a decision the company implemented in 1998 to reduce the payment of retiree life insurance premiums in annual increments. The settlement stipulation covered a class of approximately 80,000 retirees.

The debtors note in their bankruptcy plan documentation that the retiree plans affected by the March termination covered approximately 32,000 former employees.

Acosta said Sears Holdings needs to address his department's questions before circulating the plan to creditors, and advocated for the appointment of a committee in the Chapter 11 case to protect the interests of Sears' retirees.

Sears entered bankruptcy in October to reshape its physical footprint and reduce a debt load of more than $11 billion created by years of losses, store closings and unsuccessful efforts to adapt to a changing retail world.

The plan at issue provides creditor recoveries stemming in large part from a $5.2 billion sale of the company to the hedge fund owned by former Sears CEO Eddie Lampert and proceeds from causes of action preserved on behalf of the estate.

Sears is represented by Ray C. Schrock, Jacqueline Marcus, Garrett A. Fail and Sunny Singh of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.

Acosta is represented by Kate S. O'Scannlain, G. William Scott, Joanne Roskey and Leonard H. Gerson of the U.S. Department of Labor.

The case is In re: Sears Holding Corp., case number 7:18-bk-23538, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

--Additional reporting by Rick Archer. Editing by Alanna Weissman.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

HPS Investment Partners to Loan New Sears $800 Million
By Somia Biswas
The Wall Street Journal
May 3, 2019

Edward Lampert turns to HPS for loan to fund and refurbish stores

Edward Lampert's new Sears has lined up an $800 million loan from a group of lenders led by investment firm HPS Investment Partners to keep its remaining stores up and running, according to people familiar with the matter.

The three-year loan will be backed by some of the new Sears's stores, the people said. The new loan will refinance an existing loan and also provide new money to fund working capital and capital to refurbish the chain, the people also said.

Sears Holdings Corp. , which owned Sears and Kmart, filed for bankruptcy in October and closed hundreds of stores. In February, a bankruptcy judge approved a plan to sell its best-performing stores and other assets to a new company controlled by Mr. Lampert.

After years of shrinking its footprint, Sears opened three smaller stores in May, in an attempt to reclaim shoppers by selling tools and appliances.

If Sears sells any of the stores backing the new loan, the company will have to use proceeds to pay down the loan, one of the people also said.

HPS, which has $48 billion under management, was once a division of J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

"Our new real estate term loan…will allow us to continue to invest in the growth of Sears, Kmart, our leading service offerings and the Shop Your Way special shopping destination and rewards," the company said in a letter sent to Sears's vendors two weeks ago that was viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The new loan also lowers Sears's interest payments, one of the people said.

The old Sears is continuing to liquidate its remaining holdings in bankruptcy court. Last month the team winding down the old Sears sued Mr. Lampert, his hedge fund ESL Investments Inc. and others associated with ESL and Sears, accusing them of siphoning off billions of dollars in assets as the retailer racked up huge losses.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears to liquidate and close Oakbrook Center store just 7 months after renovation
By Gina Hall
Chicago Business Journal
April 22, 2019

Sears will liquidate and shutter its Oakbrook Center story this weekend following a 13-month remodel and downsizing.

The decision was rendered as part of the Hoffman Estates, Illinois-based bankruptcy proceedings, the company said in a statement per the Chicago Tribune.

The closing will occur about seven months after the store reopened after the renovations.

Transform Holdco LLC, Sears Holdings' go-forward company, now has the option not to acquire contracts formerly entered into by Sears Holdings, per the report. Transform decided not to move forward with the Oakbrook property, which it deemed unprofitable.

A liquidation sale started Monday. Eligible store associates will receive severance and can apply for open positions at other Sears and Kmart stores.

"We hate to lose Sears at Oakbrook Center," David Carlin, president and chief executive officer of the Greater Oak Brook Chamber of Commerce, said per the Tribune. "It's unfortunate that a business like Sears continues to struggle."

The space was markedly downsized in October from the 250,000-square-foot, three-story store that Sears previously had in the Oakbrook Center shopping mall to the new 62,000-square-foot space.

Sears filed for bankruptcy last fall and had plans to sell and reorganize about 400 of its most profitable stores. Last week, Sears Holding Corp. sued Eddie Lampert and his ESL Investments hedge fund, claiming they "stripped Sears of billions of dollars of assets."

According to the Sears suit, Lampert and the other defendants "transferred billions of dollars of the company's assets to its shareholders for grossly inadequate consideration or no consideration at all. ... Had defendants not taken these improper and illegal actions, Sears would have had billions of dollars more to pay its third-party creditors today and would not have endured the amount of disruption, expense, and job losses resulting from its recent bankruptcy filing. ... Altogether, Lampert caused more than $2 billion of assets to be transferred to himself and Sears' other shareholders and beyond the reach of Sears' creditors."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears sues former CEO Edward Lampert, claiming he stripped $2 billion in assets as it headed to bankruptcy
By Lauren Zumbach
Chicago Tribune
April 18, 2019

Sears Holdings Corp. has filed a lawsuit against its former chairman and CEO, Edward Lampert, and his hedge fund, claiming they wrongly siphoned $2 billion in assets from the company as it headed for bankruptcy.

"Had defendants not taken these illegal and improper actions, Sears would have had billions of dollars more to pay its third-party creditors today and would not have endured the amount of disruption, expense, and job losses resulting from its recent bankruptcy filing," lawyers for company wrote in a court filing.

The lawsuit was filed by the team winding down what remains of Sears' business after Lampert purchased the majority of its remaining assets in a bankruptcy auction and earlier this year and formed a new company out of those assets. The complaint, filed Wednesday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, seeks to recover the property that was allegedly fraudulently transferred.

The lawsuit also names former Sears directors and ESL executives and directors including U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, a former investor and executive at ESL, and Kunal Kamlani, president of ESL and a former Sears director, as defendants, as well as Sears shareholder Fairholme Capital Management and its founder Bruce Berkowitz.

Representatives for Lampert and ESL could not immediately be reached for comment. Fairholme said it is in the process of reviewing the filings.

The lawsuit claims Lampert directed employees to produce "fanciful, bad-faith" financial projections while designing transactions that allegedly unfairly benefited Lampert, ESL and other defendants. Those transactions involved Orchard Supply Hardware Stores, Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Sears Canada, Lands' End and Sears' real estate investment trust spinoff, Seritage Growth Properties.

ESL has said all its deals with Sears had the approval of the company's board. But the committee tasked with overseeing transactions involving potential conflicts of interests failed to protect Sears and its creditors, attorneys said in the lawsuit.

Lawyers for Sears claimed the 2015 spinoff of 266 of Sears' best-performing stores into Seritage Growth Properties was designed to benefit Seritage at Sears' expense. The real estate was undervalued by at least $649 million, according to the lawsuit, and terms allowing Sears to lease back space were unfair to the retailer, according to the complaint.

The terms ensured "that Sears would continue to pay Seritage rent, even for unprofitable stores, and that Seritage could invest those funds in redevelopments that ousted Sears from its most profitable stores," attorneys said in the complaint.

Lampert is both an investor in Seritage and its chairman.

Lampert's and ESL's initial attempts to buy the retailer out of bankruptcy sought to guarantee they would not be held liable for controversial transactions the hedge fund made with Sears. Following opposition from a committee of unsecured creditors, ESL's successful $5.2 billion bid dropped that requirement.

Sears also filed a proposed restructuring plan with the bankruptcy court Wednesday that would wind down the retailer's remaining assets following its $5.2 billion sale to Lampert and ESL.

Those assets would include proceeds from any lawsuits related to the transactions highlighted in the complaint or other intentional misconduct by ESL, according to the plan filed with the bankruptcy court. A hearing on the wind-down plan has been scheduled for May 16.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears will open new, smaller stores
By Anne D'Innocenzio
AP Retail Writer
April 5, 2019

After its journey through bankruptcy, Sears is getting ready to open its first batch of smaller stores that won't carry clothing but will instead focus on appliances, mattresses and home services.

The move comes after Sears has shuttered hundreds of stores in recent years.

The first three stores called Sears Home & Life will open on Memorial Day weekend and are a fraction of the size of the company's traditional stores.

Peter Boutros, chief brand officer for Sears and Kmart, declined to say how many of these new format stores are in the works but said locations have been identified.

The Hoffman Estates, Illinois-based company also plans to ramp up TV advertising and is planning to extend its Kenmore brand beyond major appliances into kitchen accessories, plates and knives.

The new smaller stores will be located in Overland Park, Kansas; Lafayette, Louisiana; and Anchorage, Alaska, Boutros said. They range in size from about 10,000 to 15,000 square feet (900 to 1,400 square meters). The average Sears is about 155,000 square feet (14,400 square meters).

The initiative come nearly two months after a bankruptcy court judge approved the sale of Sears' assets to company chairman and largest shareholder Eddie Lampert for $5.2 billion in a bankruptcy auction. With the deal, the newly formed company, which doesn't have a name, kept 425 stores open and saved roughly 45,000 jobs. It retained the Kenmore appliances and Diehard battery brands and continues to sell Craftsman tools through licensing partners. Sears sold Craftsman tools to Black & Decker in 2017. Sears Holdings Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2018. At the time of the filing, the company had about 700 stores and 68,000 employees.

"We need to instill confidence that we are open for business," said Boutros in an interview with The Associated Press, declining to comment on recent sales trends.

Lampert is restructuring the business, but Sears' long-term survival remains an open question. It has to contend with increasing competition from the likes of Best Buy, Home Depot and Walmart. Boutros said it was looking for a new CEO.

Each of the new stores will sell both major and small kitchen appliances. Customers can meet with experts to explore how new appliances will look in their home. They will also have kiosks where shoppers can order items available online from Kmart and Sears and have them delivered to the store or home.

Boutros declined to comment on sales projections for the new store formats.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

New format Sears stores to open
By Clark Schultz
Seeking Alpha
April 4, 2019

Sears says it will open three Sears Home & Life stores this May.

The company plans to open the smaller-sized stores in Anchorage, Alaska; Lafayette, Louisiana and Overland Park, Kansas.

While the stores won't sell apparel, you will be find new DieHard products in the lawn and garden sections of the locations.

Sears is also expanding its relationship with Amazon.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears ends retirees' life insurance benefits
By Lauren Zumbach
Chicago Tribune
March 27, 2019

Sears has ended life insurance benefits for eligible retirees, one of the final links to the days when the company promised generous benefits to take care of its workers.

The life insurance benefits were canceled March 15, though some retirees didn't receive letters notifying them of the change until after that date, said Ron Olbrysh, chairman of the National Association of Retired Sears Employees.

It's unclear how many Sears' retirees will lose coverage, but the company paid about $16.6 million in premiums for eligible retirees for the year that ended Dec. 31, 2017, according to a report on benefits that Olbrysh said he and other retirees received.

A company attorney declined to comment.

Retirees can convert all or part of their group life insurance policies to individual whole life policies and pay the premiums, according to the letter sent to retirees.

Sears had already sacrificed popular employee perks amid longstanding financial struggles, including significant cuts to life insurance coverage in 1997. But the company still covered life insurance policies worth at least $5,000 for eligible retirees, according to Olbrysh, who said the average policy ranged from $8,000 to $10,000.

When the company sought bankruptcy protection in October, retirees were more concerned about losing the life insurance benefits than their pensions, which were covered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. The federal pension agency moved to take over Sears' plans, which cover about 90,000 people, this year.

Olbrysh said the retirees' association was under the impression that life insurance benefits would be secure as long as Sears had not fully wound down its business.

Sears' former CEO and largest shareholder, Edward Lampert, won a bankruptcy auction in February for the retailer's remaining assets with a $5.2 billion bid and plan to keep a new, leaner version of Sears in business operation. A new entity controlled by Lampert's hedge fund, ESL Investments, has completed that transaction.

Though the life insurance benefits had been reduced over the years, it was still meaningful, said Tom Dowd, 76, who was a human resources manager when he retired after 30 years at Sears in 1998.

To Dowd, who lives in Delaware, it was the way the news was delivered that stung. He found out about it first from other retirees.

"I spent my adult life there, and if nothing else, that requires a little bit of dignity as opposed to a letter saying your benefits are gone, and here's how much you can pay to get them back," he said.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Bankruptcy Judge Pushes New Sears to Resolve Dispute With Old Company
By Lillian Rizzo
The Wall Street Journal
March 21, 2019

Old Sears claims Eddie Lampert's new Sears still owes it millions of dollars

Edward Lampert's new Sears was pushed by a bankruptcy judge Thursday to smooth over its disagreements with the entity left behind in bankruptcy protection.

Mr. Lampert's new Sears, known as Transform Holdco LLC, and the old Sears, still known as Sears Holdings Corp. , have been sparring over the terms of new Sears's purchase of the company's assets.

On Thursday, Judge Robert Drain in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in White Plains, N.Y., set aside new Sears's mediation request and encouraged the two entities to try to resolve their dispute.

"I think it's probably more productive to go as far as you all can go on these issues, and if some dispute remains that you can't resolve, I'll decide on mediation," Judge Drain said Thursday.

The new Sears took the first swing in early March, when it claimed old Sears breached its asset-purchase agreement by intentionally delaying payments to vendors and shortchanging the new company on promised inventory. Old Sears fired back, asking a bankruptcy judge to force new Sears to pay it $57.5 million.

Mr. Lampert's ESL Investments won court approval in February to purchase 425 Sears and Kmart stores for $5.2 billion, and the deal closed days later. The old Sears remains under bankruptcy protection as it works on a chapter 11 plan that will determine how much investors, vendors and professionals recover from the sale proceeds

A lawyer for the old Sears said Thursday that it is in discussions with advisers and creditors about the terms of a plan and has sent a draft to all involved parties.

The new Sears has pushed for a mediator to step in and settle the dispute between the new and old companies, according to court papers. The old Sears has balked at mediation and called it an attempt to add further distractions to the process.

At the heart of the dispute is $57.5 million that the old Sears claims it still is owed. The new Sears said it turned over foreign bank account cash and going-out-of-business proceeds to the old company, according to court papers filed Monday.

During Thursday's hearing, an old Sears attorney said other resolutions had been made regarding owed amounts, and further negotiations were continuing. A key outstanding issue, however, is roughly $14.6 million in excess credit-card accounts receivable, which new Sears still won't pay, the attorney said Thursday.

Judge Drain "strongly" advised new Sears to make the $14.6 million payment, but said the two sides should continue to negotiate the contract terms.

Another hearing is scheduled for April 18.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Shoppers, Workers Lament Its Demise
By Suzanne Kapner
The Wall Street Journal
March 18, 2019

WSJ readers recall Prodigy internet service and Lands' End; lost trust and 'shoddy products'

Reader response to The Wall Street Journal's article about the undoing of Sears Holdings Corp. shows how deeply the company was embedded in the fabric of America and how pained consumers and former employees are by its unraveling.

We received hundreds of emails and messages from readers, who shared their personal stories. Some told of shopping at Sears as a child with their parents. Others talked about the prestige that once came with a job at the retailer. Still others bemoaned the missteps that led to the company's downfall and were not shy about placing blame.

"The demise of Sears is attributed to one person, Lampert," wrote Ken Litvack of Boca Raton, Fla., referring to the hedge-fund manager Edward Lampert, who rescued Kmart from bankruptcy, merged it with Sears and was at the helm when the combined companies filed for bankruptcy in October.

Of course, there is plenty of blame to go around. Others criticized former CEOs Arthur Martinez, who closed the famed catalog in 1993, just before e-commerce took off, and Alan Lacy, who bought the Lands' End clothing brand in 2002 before selling Sears to Mr. Lampert in 2005.

"I was amazed that we were handcuffed and not able to take season-ending markdowns," wrote Chris Fonck, who worked as a Sears inventory planner in the 2000s, referring to the decision by Lands' End executives to never let the brand be discounted. "A retail store has a finite amount of space and needs to clear out seasonal merchandise to make room for the other seasonal merchandise to come in."

Sears was an early internet pioneer, founding Prodigy Communications Corp., an online service provider, in 1984 with IBM and CBS. "It quickly became evident that customers signed [on] not to buy things but to chat," wrote Ray Drop of Nokomis, Fla. Sears sold its stake in Prodigy in 1996.

"Prodigy was arguably Sears' biggest miss of all," wrote Daniel Papes, whose father, Theodore, ran the service provider.

One former employee said a turning point for Sears was in the early 1970s, when it eliminated its employee profit-sharing plan in favor of a pension. "That sapped all enthusiasm," wrote James Smith, who held various positions at Sears from 1965 to 1980.

Another blow came in the early 1990s, when Sears Auto Centers were accused of overcharging customers. The company reached a deal to settle the charges with various state attorneys general and paid restitution to customers, but the damage was done. "Sears lost the trust of its customers who simply went elsewhere," wrote Bruce Baretz, a former customer from Montclair, N.J.

Although Sears was known for its Craftsman tools, some readers complained of a decline in quality at the brand in recent years. "They killed their reputation among blue-collar customers with shoddy products," wrote Steve Wray of Florence, Ore. "Once the competition came along with better stuff, we moved on."

Still, others continued to swear by Craftsman. "When Sears sold their Craftsman tool line, that sort of eliminated any reason for me going there," wrote Roderick Crane of Honesdale, Pa.

When the retailer emerges from bankruptcy, it will have only about 425 stores. About 230 will be Sears locations and the rest will be Kmart stores. At its peak Sears had more than 900 department stores and was the country's biggest retailer.

"When I started in the management training program with Sears out of college (1967), we were doing more in annual retail sales then the next 5 retailers combined," wrote Dennis Misko of Buffalo, N.Y. "Sad to see what has happened as the result of the lack of strong leadership at the top."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

How Sears Lost the American Shopper
By Suzanne Kapner
The Wall Street Journal
March 16, 2019

It once dominated retailing-an oral history of its undoing from executives and employees who lived it

It was the 1970s and Sears was at its peak. It dominated American retailing. Its corporate headquarters was the tallest building in the world. A job at Sears was a ticket to a long and lucrative career.

But rivals like Walmart were bearing down, shopping patterns were changing and Sears started making a series of wrong bets.

Over the last four decades, a succession of CEOs have tried to reinvent, reimagine and, finally, save Sears. One discussed merging with rivals Best Buy and Home Depot, talks not previously reported. Another opened the door to hedge-fund billionaire Eddie Lampert, who went on to slash spending with little investment in stores. Amid new consumer habits, technology shifts and Sears's own missteps, customers fled.

What were the turning points when it lost its grip on the American shopper? Here is the story, told by eight people who lived it (edited from interviews). Mr. Lampert, who is poised to steer a vastly shrunken Sears out of bankruptcy, declined to be interviewed.

Above the Clouds (1970s)

Frank DeSantis joined Sears in 1973 as a management trainee. He left in 2009 as Philadelphia area district manager:

I remember going to Sears as a kid with my parents and the smell of the popcorn and the candy counter. It was the go-to retailer for folks in the middle class.

Michael Ryan joined in 1976 as a hardware salesman. He left in 2010 as vice president of the north central region:

My dad shopped at Sears. He loved the tools. I was proud to wear Toughskins, the Sears house brand of jeans. They had patches on the knee so you never wore them out.

When I started as a commissioned salesman in hardware, selling Craftsman tools and tractors, I was making about $15,000 a year, more than friends who had gone to college. There were associates who worked in the warehouse who would retire from Sears as millionaires.

Lynn Walsh joined in 1977 as an analyst. She left in 2017 as vice president of profit improvement:

You really bragged, 'Oh, I work in the Sears Tower.'

Frank DeSantis: The first time I went to headquarters, Sears was still in the tower. That was impressive. There were 110 floors. I remember being at a meeting and the clouds were below us. We were sitting on top of the clouds.

Sears reached its pinnacle in '72-'74. It had reinvented itself so many times over the years, and it was in need of changing again and guessed wrong.

Socks, Stocks and Rivals (1980s)

Frank DeSantis: CEO Ed Telling tried to take Sears in one of those evolutionary directions with the whole idea of the 'socks and stocks' purchasing of financial services. Sears was the most trusted retailer, the first credit card that most Americans could get. The idea was that Sears could enter this new arena of 401(k)s, and middle-class America would trust Sears before they would trust a stockbroker.

Michael Ryan: There was a lot of focus on Allstate, Dean Witter, Coldwell Banker and the Discover credit card, financial businesses that Sears either acquired or started. A lot of capital was coming out of the retail side to support the growth of those companies.

Alan Lacy joined Sears in 1994. He was chief financial officer and then CEO 2000-2005:

It did create a lot of shareholder value. But there came a time where it had to be unwound. The management team was distracted away from the retail business.

Michael Ryan: It wasn't reinvesting into its stores or its business direction, which was beginning to change. Computers were starting to take over and people were becoming more mobile.

Lynn Walsh: There was a new policy where in every conference room, one of the chairs had this cloth label on it that said, 'The Customer.' The point was that in every conversation you needed to be aware of what does the customer want. In my first meeting where there was that chair, there was a conversation about Walmart and do we need to be concerned? I remember listening to the senior executives in the room conclude, 'Walmart can’t touch us.'

Frank DeSantis: There was almost an arrogance with regard to the competition. We felt nobody would shop in a warehouse like Home Depot. Nobody would shop at a place like Best Buy where you didn't have dedicated salespeople.

Sears did an analysis that showed customers would drive 25 miles to buy an appliance.

Home Depot in the '80s started dropping stores in between two Sears stores. If you're driving past two Home Depots on your way to a Sears store, you start to wonder, "Why am I driving?"

By the later part of the 1980s the realization came that these folks were gathering momentum, and something needed to be done. Two things happened in the late ’80s. One was the recognition that Best Buy was a competitor to be dealt with, and we started to add other appliance brands beside Kenmore and Whirlpool. And then we started accepting credit cards other than the Sears card.

The Catalog Gets Axed (1990s)

Arthur Martinez, a former Saks Fifth Avenue executive, ran the Sears Merchandise Group from 1992 to 1995 and was CEO 1995-2000:

When I was being recruited to Sears, I was really on the fence about whether I should do it or not. One of the directors was Donald Rumsfeld. He was aware that I was waffling, and called me up and told me it was my duty as an American to take the job.

Frank DeSantis: Until then, every CEO had come up within the Sears ranks.

Arthur Martinez: There was a tremendous amount of apprehension on the part of the Sears team. They were absolutely convinced that I was going to just pick the place apart and break it up into pieces, and they started a little subterranean nickname for me, which was the 'Axe from Saks.'

The big question was, what do we do about the catalog business? Because that's the bleeder that we’ve got to cauterize. And then, what are we going to do about the stores?

The competition was moving past us. Walmart was three to four times our size already. Home Depot, Lowe’s, Circuit City, Best Buy and Target, and even at that point Kmart, were all growing, and we were declining.

Lynn Walsh: I had a lot of input about Walmart from our suppliers. They would tell stories about how they're SOBs, the way they negotiate. They'd say, 'We'd much rather do business with you.'When Sears executives got wind of that, they were like, well, you guys are terrible negotiators; you'd better be more like Walmart.

Alan Lacy: The Sears department store was not a very robust economic model. While the appliance business was our signature, it's a small business. The appliance category is just not that big. People buy appliances every 10 years, at most.

Frank DeSantis: One of the things that Sears had done so well was its distribution and logistics around appliances. A washer could be manufactured at a GE plant in Kentucky, get loaded on a truck to the warehouse that night, and then cross back over to the home delivery pad by early in the morning and be delivered the next day.

Arthur Martinez: I came to the conclusion that we couldn't do two jobs, fixing the catalog and fixing the stores. The catalog was the easy choice to be sacrificed.

After a very anguished debate, the board came to agree with me. The hard part was that 50,000 people lost their jobs.

Michael Ryan: That was eye-opening for everyone. We had antiquated distribution centers and the catalog was too expensive to print and we just closed it versus trying to fix it. It was a turning point.

The Softer Side of Sears

Michael Ryan: Arthur wanted Sears to be an apparel store in the mall because that's what malls had. So we started to take our hardware departments or our appliance departments and move them to the back of the store.

Lynn Walsh: To think that we were sacrificing extremely profitable floor space to give to apparel that was underperforming both revenue-wise as well as profit-wise, was…oh. There were some people who were just apoplectic.

Sears Segment Review

Frank DeSantis: The Sears apparel business never had the dominance that Sears hardlines did. Every CEO was quickly faced with a dilemma, how to improve the apparel business, which has great margins, or get out of it.

If you go into a Saks Fifth Avenue, which is where Arthur came from, you see maybe eight or 10 pieces on a rack. The whole perception is, 'I better buy it today, because it might not be here next week.' At Sears, there was stock on the floor in bulk, huge quantities. There was no incentive to buy it today at regular price, because it would always go on sale. The whole apparel business was missing a fashion approach.

Arthur Martinez: Sears had come to ignore that it was the woman in the American family who did the shopping for everything. We had to remove the mental block she had about the store not being for her. That was the genesis of making apparel a more important part of the business. The hardware and appliance businesses weren't disadvantaged by that.

Alan Lacy: We had a great ad campaign for a while, 'The Softer Side of Sears,' which unfortunately didn't say anything about appliances and home improvement. What we had on the floor in apparel didn't really distinguish itself very much.

Lynn Walsh: There was an awful lot of jabbing about, 'Oh, you guys are polyester kings.' The struggle was Sears, at least in apparel, wanted to be more hip. They wanted to appeal to younger customers. Unfortunately, they had older customers. The income level was lower. Ninety percent of what was selling were the same old polyester pants.

Arthur Martinez: It worked for five years. Things don't last forever, and it became less impactful, mostly through repetition.

Stuck in Malls; Internet's Coming

Arthur Martinez: The issue that we had was that 90% of our stores were in shopping malls. Everybody could see what was going on with Walmart, Target and the others going to strip centers. That was increasingly more customer friendly than the schlep from a big parking lot all the way into the mall.

In late 1998, I explored a merger with Best Buy and Home Depot, which would have given us access to a huge network of off-mall locations.

Best Buy's expectations were so high that there was no favorable return on our investment. I think the stock was at $7 and founder Dick Schulze wanted in the high $20s. With Home Depot, the antitrust analysis indicated that there was competitive overlap and that federal regulators would demand the divestment of a significant number of stores, most of them Home Depot stores. Bernie Marcus and Arthur Blank could not countenance that as the founders. Every store is their baby.

Frank DeSantis: Sears was the Amazon of its day. It sold everything for everybody.

The catalog was the precursor to the internet. It gave access to everything in the store to people around the country. Over the course of 100-plus years, Sears had accumulated a wealth of customer shopping data.

Sears had anticipated the changing trends of retailing so many times in the past. But it missed the biggest change in recent history, the shift to online shopping.

Arthur Martinez: We closed the catalog in 1993. The internet hadn't been created yet. We had to focus on the mother lode, which were the roughly 900 full-line stores.

In 1999 we started paying attention to the internet. And we did it much sooner than anyone else in the business. We already had the infrastructure to deliver appliances to people from a warehouse. So we launched sears.com with the appliance business.

Eddie Lampert talked about spending a lot of money, but he didn’t build much of an online business.

Lynn Walsh: The bulk of our customer base, they weren't innovators in terms of wanting to try the next new thing. Plus, our online site was cumbersome.

'Hi, I'm Eddie Lampert' (2000s)

Alan Lacy: When I became CEO, my first major investor conference was in November of 2000. Following the meeting, Eddie comes up to me and says, 'Hi. I'm Eddie Lampert. I like the story and I'm gonna look at buying stock.' Not too long thereafter, Eddie shows up roughly as a 5% holder of our company.

He was viewed as very patient capital. His general bias is you should invest less in the business to have more free cash flow to buy back stock.

The only time that we had any contention was when we bought Lands' End. He felt we would have been better taking that $1.9 billion and buying back stock, which was interesting because he grew to appreciate the Lands' End brand very much.

Michael Ryan: Lands' End was a bold move and it could have worked. But it was always kind of an orphaned child. I remember going to the first meeting where we had Lands' End leadership at Sears and they [the Lands' End executives] said Lands' End will never be discounted.

Alan Lacy: Here's a business that never went on sale, surrounded by product that was always on sale.

Walmart reset prices for the industry. If Walmart is selling a decent pair of jeans for $20, it's hard to sell a somewhat better pair of jeans for $60.

Do-It-Yourself Shopping

Michael Ryan: Arthur was merchandise-focused, Alan had more of an operational focus. We went from trying to be a high-end department store to what they called store simplification. Remove mannequins, simplify the presentation.

Alan Lacy: The department-store service model was expensive and the customer had been conditioned at that point to think that self-service was actually better. So we embraced self-select. I find the tool I'm looking for and put it in a basket. I go to the self-service footwear department. I go to a central cashier.

Michael Ryan: We still had a commission hardware business, a commission appliance, electronics, mattress, carpeting business. We didn't spend any time focusing on those core areas and how to remodel the space that we took out to give to apparel. And our pricing, we didn't make it come down on apparel.

Alan Lacy: If there’s a significant strategic failure on the part of Sears over quite a long period of time, it was the inability to get off mall with a viable, important retail format.

In my era, we tried the Sears Grand format, basically a big-box store that was right across the highway from Walmart, Target, Home Depot and Lowe's. Those first few stores that we did, they were doing $45 million and our mall-based stores were doing $25 million in annual sales.

We couldn't build enough stores to really catch up to what was happening at that point with 1,000 new competitive outlets being opened every year by Home Depot, Lowe's, et cetera.

Leena Munjal joined Sears in 2003 and is currently one of three co-CEOs:

There is a lot said about Sears being unable to adapt to the changing times but my personal view with the company is different. We noticed the change in customer behavior, we knew the effect of technology and we catered to customers who were starting to shop differently.

Marrying Kmart (mid-2000s)

Alan Lacy: I approached Eddie who had just rescued Kmart from bankruptcy and said, 'We might have an interest in acquiring quite a few locations.' We wound up acquiring 50 locations in the middle of 2004.

Michael Ryan: I was brought from Charlotte to Chicago to convert the Kmart stores that Alan had decided to purchase into Sears stores. We did the first two. We spent several million each to remodel those stores. It was pretty successful. We had long lines for the grand opening.

I was walking a store with Alan right after the opening. He got a call, because Vornado was making a run at Sears. He had to get back on the jet and leave.

Alan Lacy: That was in October 2004. We were already in discussions with Eddie about merging Sears and Kmart, but we hadn't announced a deal.

There was a tone in the marketplace that certain retailers may have more value in their real estate than in their retail concerns. Vornado's interest in us solidified that.

I didn't have 100% confidence in our company's future. Trying to get off mall one store at a time, it wasn't clear to me that we would be successful longer term. Eddie was willing to pay the premium.

Lynn Walsh: I was part of a small team working premerger. We compiled information that we gave to Eddie and his hedge-fund team. They had their spurs on and their guns drawn. If you worked for Sears, you must have been an idiot. How could you use this form? How could you spend this? Everything they looked at, they said, 'We'll do it differently.' Our morale was horrible.

Dev Mukherjee joined in 2007 and was chief innovation officer and president of the toy, seasonal and home-appliance businesses. He left in 2012:

Eddie was incredibly charismatic. He had a plan to transform retail by leveraging the best of what Kmart and Sears had, the best of what technology could enable in customer experience and service. Others have suggested that from the beginning, it was a one-way journey downhill. That just isn't the reality.

Michael Ryan: Growing up in the retail business I had seen other retailers merge and usually end up out of business.

Potholes in the Parking Lot

Alan Lacy: It became clear early on that Eddie's focus was maximizing cash flow in order to buy back stock. And in that process, the culture changed. Some of the investments that could have been made to have given the off-mall conversions a better chance of working weren’t made.

Michael Ryan: We went from spending several million on the remodels to doing it for a quarter of that price. We were taking Kmart stores that were in deplorable condition and trying to put Sears products in them and it was a disaster. The Kmart customers left, and the Sears customers didn't come because the buildings were not in the best places and not in the best shape.

Lynn Walsh: Right from 2005, there was not a willingness to invest anything in the stores. New fixtures? Why can't you use the ones you have? You want to redo that part of the floor? Why do we need to do that? It just got to the point where executives stopped asking, because you knew what the answer was going to be. I remember visiting a Sears store in the Chicago area. The parking lot was like a war zone with the potholes. That was when it hit me. What customer would go through this when they can go to so many other stores and get very similar merchandise for a comparable price?

Dev Mukherjee: Eddie was actually very happy to invest. The underlying question was not, 'I don’t want to spend money.' The underlying question was, 'Show me how this works and how we can provide a better experience to the consumer and make more money.'

Leena Munjal: I don't think Eddie gets enough credit for what he did in terms of investing in the business. We pushed for a lot of technology investment. We were one of the first retailers to launch 'buy online, pick up in-store.' This was in 2001.

While we were ahead on some things, by the time we started to pick up some traction there was not enough runway.

Michael Ryan: Eddie had a point of view that traditional retailers spend too much on stores, spend too much on marketing and probably carried more inventory than they needed.

He was looking to demonstrate that there was a different way to run a retail business versus the conventional wisdom at the time.

Alan Lacy: To some degree, Eddie was correct that retailers do spend too much.

Michael Ryan: The Sears customer was changing faster than Sears was changing. Eddie created a focus on exploiting the technology of how the customer shops, which they should have been doing long before he came in. But Sears was struggling with how to reinvent its stores.

Alan Lacy: Effectively, Eddie was CEO. I didn't want to pretend to be the CEO. I stayed another nine months to help in the transition. I stopped being CEO in '05, and left in '06.

Lynn Walsh: In 2005, before the merger, we had concluded a $2.5 billion negotiation with the suppliers of Kenmore, mainly Whirlpool. Eddie comes in and says, 'What you just negotiated, isn't good enough. I want more.' Even though we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars of profit, he thought we should have more. That was the beginning of the animosity between Sears and its suppliers.

Michael Ryan: Eddie believed he knew more than anybody else. I had a conversation with him about putting the right merchandise in the store for the customer that lived within the radius of that store, and Eddie said, 'We have a Kmart in the Hamptons that does great.' The customers come in and they buy, I think he was saying, the $15 folding chairs. They'd buy them for their parties and then they'd throw them away. So why can't a store be anywhere and do business? That was a huge disconnect, because most people would buy that chair and hold on to it for 20 years.

Frank DeSantis: By 2007-2008, it was not anywhere close to the same company. The Kmart merger rapidly disintegrated the culture.

After the merger, I didn't have time to walk the store, understand the situation and help the management team because I'm doing a check sheet. It was so micromanaged. What it became was everybody was looking at the little things, and the big things fell apart.

Lynn Walsh: One of the things that Eddie’s team developed was an intracompany message system similar to Twitter. Managers would track how often you used it. After a certain point, everybody was tracked on everything. What time you came into the office, what time you left the office. It was 'Big Brother.' We used to laugh about it, because otherwise you would cry.

Game of Thrones

Frank DeSantis: We ran into the real-estate crisis in 2008-2009, which immediately put a crimp on the value of the real estate. And there was a lack of understanding of how intertwined so much of the company was. It wasn't as easy to separate the various pieces without destroying the whole thing.

Dev Mukherjee: My mandate was to reorganize the company. That's where all of these independent business units came from and the new kind of operating model. Eddie had the idea of making it more like a marketplace. And the businesses where it worked, it worked really well. Sears returned to be No. 1 in appliances, No. 1 in sporting goods.

Leena Munjal: We wanted to have the leaders of the businesses think like CEOs. To not just look at driving sales, but at the overall profitability. It worked well in some areas and in certain areas it didn't.

Michael Ryan: It was awful. It made it competitive from one business unit to the other. Every business had to show a profit, so if you were a small business trying to grow and you weren't making as much profit you wouldn't get advertising, wouldn't get support.

Lynn Walsh: I don't know if you're familiar with 'Game of Thrones?' That’s exactly what it was like. It set up this incredible infighting.

Frank DeSantis: It was no longer teamwork. It really became a very toxic environment.

Lynn Walsh: The weekly Thursday morning teleconferences with Eddie were embarrassing. We would all avoid eye contact with each other in those meetings, because it was humiliating. He would say, 'How could you possibly think that was a good decision?'

Why pay your direct reports millions of dollars if you'e just going to ignore their recommendations?

Dev Mukherjee: The discipline that Eddie brought to those meetings, from his finance background, to debate things on facts, to really explore options, and then to quickly make decisions, I always felt was very good. It is true, Eddie could be a little harsh if he felt people were not well prepared.

He would tell them so, and it wouldn't matter that the rest of the team was there, which is not the approved management technique.

Leena Munjal: He's comfortable being challenged and encourages it. It's really important that you have your facts straight when you disagree with him, because he will challenge you back.

Lynn Walsh: Around 2009 or 2010, a story started circulating within the company that Eddie got upset because an executive was carrying a shopping bag from a competing retailer. After that, employees at headquarters were afraid to use any bag that wasn't from Sears or Kmart.

Selling Stores (2010)

Dev Mukherjee: In 2011 and 2012, the vast majority of stores were still in pretty good condition. Once they started selling off stores, and the volume fell off, then there was even less money to invest in the business.

Fred Imber was a mattress salesman in Bethesda, Md., from 2008 until the store closed in January:

Sears advertising worked. When the advertising was slimmed down, it had an impact on our customer traffic. In the past couple of years, even around Christmas, I don't remember seeing any Sears TV ads.

Dev Mukherjee: Eddie's idea around creating membership and loyalty were great but by the time those came out, there just wasn't enough product to drive frequency.

Fred Imber: I never saw a reward card that gave away so much money. You buy $100 worth of merchandise, you got $75 back in rewards points. That encouraged people to come back and buy more stuff, but they were getting a lot of it for free.

Leena Munjal: While we're not moving away from traditional and digital marketing, we're evolving to more personalized marketing through our membership program. That helps build repeat purchases and relationships over time.

Michael Ryan: When you're not doing top-down revenue growth, you can only squeeze the middle so much until there's nothing else to squeeze. Some of your fixed expenses never change, and over the last 50 years that's what's happened to Sears. Everybody can point their finger at everybody, but I don't think Alan or even Eddie ultimately destroyed Sears. Over the last 30, 40 years it just didn't know how to remain focused on its customers.

Lynn Walsh: The suppliers wanted to shorten payment terms as our credit and financial standing became less stable. It got to the point of being absurd. It was like, wink wink, nod nod. Oh yeah, we're going to grow 2% next year. Ha ha. Given last year we decreased double digits. I ended up leaving, because I had no integrity anymore. I was trying to negotiate on the promise that we've got a plan to grow the business, knowing that was never going to happen.

Toward Chapter 11

Alan Lacy: In 2014, with the Lands' End spinoff, and then the Seritage spinoff and the Craftsman sale, that's when it seemed to shift into, he's managing for cash flow, or liquidation. Everybody knew how the movie was going to end.

It was just a question of how many minutes are left.

Arthur Martinez: The sale of Craftsman to Stanley Black & Decker was the ultimate capitulation. How could he take the birthright brand of Craftsman, which was truly iconic, and put it into Ace Hardware, and now it’s in Lowe's. It just kills me. Once you lose control of these brands, you are no longer the destination for them.

Fred Imber: The lack of staff really disrupted the entire operation for at least the last two to three years. They were seriously cutting the payroll. That was a distraction for the commissioned salespeople because we had no cashiers on our particular level. We were on the top floor of a two-floor Sears, and the few cashiers that were left were all working downstairs. At the end, they weren’t even maintaining the registers. A lot of the registers were broken. I didn't even see a cleaning crew at all.

I stayed with Sears because of the reputation it had when I was growing up. There was no retailer that was more committed to customer service.

Leena Munjal: Eddie called me the weekend before and told me we were going to file for bankruptcy. I could tell it was very difficult for him to convey that message to me. He was focused on finding a solution to save the company and as many jobs as possible. As difficult as bankruptcy was, there was a silver lining. It was that we will emerge better capitalized. We cut our debt from over $5 billion to a little over $1 billion. We might be smaller, relative to our store base in the past, but we're healthier.

Alan Lacy: I wasn't surprised by the bankruptcy. I've expected this for the last six or seven years.

Michael Ryan: Twenty years from now nobody will know Sears was here. Like who's heard of W.T. Grants? They went out of business 40 years ago and they were one of the largest retailers after Sears.

When the company emerges from bankruptcy, it will have roughly 220 Sears-branded stores.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

The Sale of Sears To Lampert Ain't Over Yet - Major Problems Have Developed
By Wyco Researcher
Seeking Alpha
March 11, 2019

The soap opera drama of the sale of Sears to Eddie Lampert/ESL continues. Lampert wants the bankruptcy judge to approve their motion that a mediator be selected to help resolve their major issues with Sears Holdings. These problems are no surprise given that some were voiced in open court already as "make or break" issues during the asset sale hearing.

For investors, the problem is that there could be now even less money to pay administrative claims, which would completely eliminate any hope for unsecured note holders to receive any recovery, except for possible modest payment for releases. It could also mean that Sears is "administratively insolvent" and may not be able to exit Ch.11 using the traditional method of exiting after a confirmation of a reorganization plan. For employees, it could mean that there may not be $40 million available to pay severance pay.

Since it was widely expected for years that Lampert would try to buy assets of Sears in any bankruptcy, one would expect that transition plans would have been thoroughly analyzed to make the transition seamless. Nope. The transition has been a disaster. This is just another example, in my opinion, of Eddie Lampert's inept and incompetent managerial skills.

They did not even prepare their own cash management, as Sears Holding's lawyer, Ray Schrock, wrote in an email, "Buyer was not prepared to set up its own cash management system by the time the Closing so, as a concession to Buyer, Sellers allowed Buyer to use its existing cash management system, including its existing bank accounts".


Transform Holdco LLC (Lampert/ESL) filed a motion and a declaration in support of the motion on March 7 with the bankruptcy court to "assign matter to mediation". OldSears is against going into mediation and thinks that having meetings with Judge Drain is the course to follow. [Note: to reduce confusion, I will refer to Sears Holdings as OldSears] At the time of me writing this article, this issue will be on the calendar during the March 21 hearing. A number of other important issues are on the calendar that day as well. If the judge agrees to mediation, the parties have up to 7 days to agree to the selection of a mediator. Mediations are confidential, but are not binding. It would mean they mutually agree on specific issues.


There are a large number of disagreements by both parties and I will only cover a few of the key ones. First, it seems that OldSears was in much worse shape than Lampert expected at closing. They "burned" through $666 million cash from November 3 to the February 11 closing. This was during the busy Christmas shopping season and when stores were liquidating their inventory prior to closing. [OldSears had a total of $778 million cash on November 3 which included $112 million cash borrowed under the DIP. On the February 11 closing there was $0.00 cash and a little over $200k DIP shortfall.]

For some contested items, the shortfall of an item would impact $40 million severance reimbursement obligations first, followed by $139 million vendor section 503(b)(9) claims, which Lampert agreed to pay in his bid. In a court statement, these claims were estimated to potentially total $173 million, which would mean that OldSears would be responsible for other $34 million of these administrative claims.

Some of the contested items include:

Other Accounts Payable-This $166 million item was already talked about in open court on February 7. Lawyers for OldSears stated in court if they did not get the $166 million, the deal was off. Judge Drain stated he could not actually rule on this issue citing some district court decision. He could have, in my opinion, declared a recess and let the parties resolve the matter at that time. If they could not resolve it, then the sale would be off.

Lampert is now asserting they agreed to pay these payables for only ordered inventory and not for any other accounts payable. Lampert is also asserting that OldSears delayed payments on accounts payable during the few days prior to closing to save cash and increase the amount that Lampert would have to pay. After paying $110 million, they stopped paying until they can figure out which ones were inflated by this alleged action.

Prepaid Inventory-Lampert claims it is short by at least $97 million (docket 2767 stated $97 million and docket 2766 stated $78 million) asserting prepaid inventory is less than $50 million compared to the expected $147 million. OldSears claims it short by about $63 million. Using just the $63 million shortfall, the payment of $40 million severance reimbursement obligations would be gone and the administrative claim payments to vendors would be reduced by $23 million. Employees are expected to be upset.

Accounts Receivable-Lampert claims the $255 million accounts receivable contains many problems/errors of $120 million and that the real value of these receivables is $135 million. OldSears' rebuttal is that Lampert could have done due diligence on the quality of these receivables. (I find it incredible that Lampert is asserting problems with these. He was CEO until a few months ago and now claims he was unaware of these receivable problems.)

Cash Shortfall For DIP-Lampert claims that there was a $43 million cash shortfall to pay the $1.2 billion DIP (DIP and Jr. DIP). OldSears states there is only about $200k shortfall to pay DIP and there is $35 million cash needed to pay for releases that Lampert/ESL is not including in their calculations.

Credit Card Deposit- OldSears is claiming that they are owed a $28.1 million for credit card deposit held by First Data.

There are other contested items, but these are some of the major ones. Part of the problem stems from the fact that Lampert assumed the use OldSears cash management system (even OldSears' bank accounts) and that there was not a direct transfer of accounting items from one account to another.

OldSears Is Against Mediation

In the exchange of emails, Ray Schrock wrote, "We have a judge that can meet with us. Waste of time." On March 6, he used even stronger language, "we intend to seek relief from the Court" if OldSears does not receive $57.5 million by noon on March 7. (As I write this report, I have not seen any litigation filings by OldSears yet.). OldSears has until March 14 to file an objection with court for a mediator.

Severe Cash Problems

Cash seems to be a problem for OldSears. Based solely on comments in the exchanged emails, it seems that OldSears had $0.00 cash left on the closing date. To preserve cash prior to closing, they even had to greatly reduce the amount of prepaid inventory ordered and not pay some accounts payable when they were due. OldSears still owns some minor assets not sold to Lampert, but their cash value is unknown. The vendor $139 million (subject to downward adjustments) 507(b)(9) vendor claims that Lampert agreed to assume are to be paid by ESL/Lampert and not OldSears.

The only current sources of cash that I can find are:

*$4.75 million released from the escrow account relating to the failed sale to Service .com

*$57.5 million Schrock demanded to be paid on March 7.

*$28.1 million First Data deposit.

Total $90.35 million

From this $95 million, administrative claims and priority administrative claims need to be paid. I, therefore, expect a nasty fight over the court approving any priority 507(b) claims. Filings for the proof of claims are due by April 10. (docket 2676), which will give us an exact total of these administrative claims.

Reorganization Plan Status

I edited my prior article to reflect the decision by the court to only extend the exclusive period to file a reorganization plan until April 15 instead of June 12, after the UCC filed an objection. Since there are no operations and few assets to divide up in the OldSears, the UCC did not see why management needed so much extra time to create a plan to exit Ch.11, especially when legal fees continue the longer they are bankruptcy. With all these issues about the terms of the sale, I am not sure that they will be able to file any type of plan by April 15. They were instructed by the judge to give him an update on the status at the March 21 hearing.

At this point, I do not think there will be a traditional reorganization plan created. There will be just some type of liquidating plan that will establish a method for certain claims being paid and OldSears will seek to have the bankruptcy filing dismissed to exit Ch.11. This is because OldSears may not have the cash to pay the administration claims, which means they would not meet one of the requirements for the court to confirm a traditional reorganization plan.

I think that Lampert does not need a reorganization plan confirmed in order to get the large net operating losses-NOL. Under the original agreement he would have needed this, but it was amended to so that Lampert was buying limited liability companies and not just assets. Most articles in media about this issue have been based on the original agreement and not the amended one. I also feel that is why Lampert is so aggressive in getting reductions in amounts he still owes because he no longer has to worry about Sears Holdings being administratively insolvent and can't exit Ch.11 under a confirmed reorganization plan.

Professional Fees

The fees that are being incurred by OldSears are having a very negative impact on stakeholders. There will now be even less cash for vendors and investors. Weil Gotshal, for example, submitted fees for December that total $7.7 million. That is just for one month. FTI Consulting submitted fees that included an individual consultant billing 402.5 hours for just January alone. (That is about 13 hours per day-every day of the month.) There are many law firms and consultants retained by various groups that are going to be paid from the OldSears Estate.

The total amount by the time this over will be massive. Oddly, with all these "experts" involved, we still see a chaotic asset sale/transfer. If OldSears would have filed for Ch.7 last October instead of Ch.11, almost all of these legal/consultant fees would have been avoided, which would have meant more cash for investors/other stakeholders...


Given what I saw in court during many days of hearings, the chaotic transfer comes as no surprise. The shortfall in some the contested items has a very negative impact on investors, vendors, and employees. There will be less cash available to pay claims. At this point, I am not yet worried about the $35 million to pay for releases, but I still remain uncertain about PBGC's first claim on release payments, as I covered in another Sears article. Both SHLDQ shareholders and holders of unsecured debt are so far "underwater", their only hope for any payment is from releases.

The chaotic transfer, massive legal/consulting fees, and continued declining operations all point to the conclusion that stakeholders in Sears Holdings Corp. would have been better off if the company would have filed for Ch. 7 last October instead of Ch.11.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

What's 'the real home' of Craftsman tools? It's not Sears anymore, Stanley says in lawsuit.
By Lauren Zumbach
Chicago Tribune
March 7, 2019

The tool manufacturer that bought Sears' Craftsman tools line is asking the courts to make Sears stop touting itself as the "real" home of the iconic brand.

Stanley Black & Decker bought the Craftsman brand from Sears Holdings Corp. in 2017. The deal, valued at $900 million, let both brands continue making and selling products under the Craftsman label.

But Stanley said Sears' new line of professional-grade mechanics' tools under the "Craftsman Ultimate Collection" brand, as well as Sears' efforts to promote itself as "the real home of the broadest assortment of Craftsman," violate the companies' agreement, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court in New York.

Stanley, based in New Britain, Conn., said the slogan falsely implies Craftsman products sold elsewhere are "illegitimate" and could confuse shoppers and hurt the brand, according to the lawsuit.

Hoffman Estates-based Sears could not immediately be reached for comment.

Craftsman's history at Sears goes back to 1927, when the retailer decided to create a higher-end line of tools. According to a company history website, Sears bought rights to use the Craftsman name from Marion-Craftsman Tool Company for $500. The brand first appeared on a line of saws and power tools were introduced two years later, in 1929.

For years, the overwhelming majority of Craftsman products were sold only at Sears.

But in 2016, long-struggling Sears announced it was looking for ways to get more cash out of its best-known brands, including Craftsman, Kenmore and DieHard, by expanding their distribution outside its stores. The 2017 sale to Stanley gave Sears an immediate cash infusion and a chance to benefit from the brand's growth at other retailers through royalty payments.

It also meant Sears and Stanley began making and selling competing Craftsman products.

As Stanley began rolling out its Craftsman products, selling them at retailers including Lowe's and Ace Hardware, Sears defended its ties to the brand. A company blog post in August said Sears still had the largest Craftsman selection of any U.S. retailer. After Sears sought bankruptcy protection in October, in the run-up to the critical holiday shopping season, Sears referred to itself as the "original" or "real" home of Craftsman on social media.

Stanley said its agreement with Sears put limits on how Sears could use the Craftsman brand, and that the new Craftsman Ultimate Collection line ran afoul of certain restrictions. Both companies also agreed not to do anything that could tarnish the brand, according to the lawsuit.

Those restrictions still apply now that Sears has a new owner, Stanley said. The retailer's former CEO and chairman, Edward Lampert, bought the company - including its rights to use the Craftsman brand - out of bankruptcy last month in a deal valued at $5.2 billion.

Stanley is asking the courts to stop Sears from using the tagline and "Craftsman Ultimate Collection" label and remove references to both from its websites, social media platforms and advertising. It is also seeking damages of more than $75,000, according to the lawsuit.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Stanley Black & Decker sues Sears over use of Craftsman brand
By Jason Aycock
Seeking Alpha
March 6, 2019

Sears is headed back to court, this time in a fight over its iconic Craftsman tool brand.

Stanley Black & Decker has sued the venerable retailer for breach of contract and trademark infringement, for marketing a line of pro-grade mechanic tools under the Craftsman Ultimate Collection brand.

Sears sold the long-running Craftsman brand to Stanley in 2017 for about $900M, and retained a limited license to sell some Craftsman products.

But Sears is touting its stores as "the real home of the broadest assortment of Craftsman," which Stanley says suggests other Craftsman products are "somehow illegitimate."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

What Will Happen to All of the Vacant Sears/Kmart Boxes?
By Liz Wolf
National Real Estate Investor
February 28, 2019

While some boxes will be retrofitted, others will be razed as it may be cheaper and easier to start over. Meanwhile, the weakest locations may sit vacant for years.

While Chairman Eddie Lampert and his hedge fund ESL Investment managed to buy Sears out of bankruptcy and avoid liquidation—saving about 400 Sears stores—the looming question is what will happen to the hundreds of other shuttered Sears and Kmart locations around the country.

Sears Holdings Corp., which owns Sears and Kmart stores, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last October after facing years of plummeting sales, while being saddled with a huge debt load.

NREI reported in October that if Sears liquidates, it would flood the market with around 100 million sq. ft. of vacant retail space.

The giant department store chain has closed hundreds of stores over the past few years, shuttering its weaker-performing units first, many located in tertiary or rural markets where it will be tougher to find users to take over the massive big boxes. Industry experts say the weakest locations could stay vacant for years.

"The impact of the vacant Sears and Kmart boxes is going to be tremendous on the market because the majority are old and functionally obsolete," says Lauren Leach, director of real estate advisory services at Birmingham, Mich.-based consulting and advisory firm Conway MacKenzie. "They're over 100,000 sq. ft. to 200,000 sq. ft. in some cases. The Sears stores are often two-story buildings, so retrofitting is going to be really difficult-not only because they're old and functionally obsolete, but because there are very few concepts that are big enough to backfill them."

Many retail operators want smaller formats, meaning vacant spaces would likely need to be subdivided to accommodate several tenants. Repurposing space is expensive, however. A landlord of an already struggling mall may not have the capital to do what it takes to sign a new user.

"Landlords will consider demising spaces for multiple users, but that's a really expensive endeavor," Leach says. "A lot of it's going to depend on whether the location is freestanding or contiguous and part of an overall development. That's going to be a major differentiating factor for landlords."

Landlords with prime locations in strong malls should have an easier time

Many landlords of strong-performing malls are relieved that they can finally backfill a struggling Sears store, which hasn't been driving foot traffic to their property.

These owners are "thrilled to have these boxes back," Leach says. She notes most Sears' leases are so old that the rates are artificially low; they're well below market in terms of 2019 standards.

"Getting the space back allows landlords the opportunity to secure new users at market rates, and the new uses will undoubtedly be more exciting than a Sears or Kmart was and bring more traffic to the center," Leach adds.

Deep-pocketed landlords and real estate companies have been acquiring Sears and Kmart boxes with plans to retrofit and backfill them. However, in some cases, experts say razing the boxes and redeveloping the sites might be cheaper and easier.

Who's hungry for space?

Last December, Sears hired JLL to gauge interest in Sears' real estate portfolio. Burlington Stores, At Home Group, Dick's Sporting Goods and U-Haul have shown interest in acquiring some Sears and Kmart locations.

Fitness concepts, value retailers, restaurants, grocers and medical users are also actively considering the closed stores. Movie theater chains and entertainment concepts like trampoline parks and kids' play areas have also shown interest.

It has been reported that Amazon is eyeing closed Sears and Kmart stores to expand Whole Foods.

"It's a smart move on Amazon's part and it's very calculated because they can come in with leverage," Leach says. "If you're a landlord and you don't want to pay to demise or demo and build a new building, you have a bird in the hand when Amazon comes to you and says, 'We'll take your space as is. Just give us a bunch of money for TIs or landlord’s work.' In many cases, that’s easier for a landlord."

NREI took look at some success stories of Sears/Kmart stores being retrofitted.

Fitness concepts muscle up to fill vacancies

Gold's Gym opened a 53,000-sq.-ft. gym on the upper level of a former Sears store at the Galleria at Crystal Run in Middletown, N.Y., and is eyeing more empty Sears stores.

A three-story Life Time with a rooftop pool is being developed on the site of a former Sears Auto Center at Brookfield-owned Oakbrook Center in Chicago.

Seritage Growth Properties-a Sears spin-off focused on real estate redevelopment-and Equinox Fitness partnered to transform a former Sears store and Auto Center at Westfield UTC in La Jolla, Calif. The store and auto center are being repurposed into The Collection at UTC, which will be an upscale live/work/play environment. The two companies say they will partner on other Sears store conversions.

In other examples of retrofits, Seritage is transforming a former Sears in downtown Santa Monica, Calif., into a 100,000-sq.-ft. creative office and retail destination called The Mark 302.

PREIT renovated a former Sears at Viewmont Mall in Scranton, Penn., and brought in Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods and Field & Stream. The REIT also recaptured the former Sears box at Valley Mall in the Washington D.C. area and signed a lease with Dick's Sporting Goods.

Chicago developer Springbank Real Estate Group is converting a former Sears store in Chicago's Ravenswood neighborhood into 59 apartments and commercial space. It signed for-profit college DeVry University as a first-floor tenant.

In Bloomfield Hills, Mich., a former Kmart was converted into an At Home. A U-Haul is moving into a vacant Kmart space in Des Moines, Iowa, and a former Kmart in Blaine, Minn., is being retrofitted for an Auto Zone and Xperience Fitness.

Medical and wellness is hot use

UF Health will move into the former Sears space in the Oaks Mall in Gainesville, Fla., following a complete retrofit. Also, a vacant Kmart in Little Rock, Ark. will be redeveloped into the $35 million "Premier Medical Plaza."

More healthcare is moving to retail locations to be closer to patients.

There's a "massive movement in wellness today," and some retail boxes are being converted into this opportunity for health and wellness, says Anjee Solanki, national director for U.S. retail services with real estate services firm Colliers International. "In the last eight months, I've seen more LOIs specific to healthcare and that wellness space."

That sector could include everything from traditional healthcare clinics to modern acupuncture and IV vitamin therapy concepts.

Tear down and start over

In some cases, it makes more sense to raze the Sears and Kmart stores and repurpose the sites into uses like hospitality, office, entertainment or residential.

"Many landlords will choose to demolish the boxes rather than reuse them, especially if they're freestanding," Leach says. "Given the age and size of the boxes, it's just easier, and in many cases just as cost-effective, to start from scratch. Doing so would really allow other asset classes like office and hotels to build on that dirt."

For example, the former Sears store was scraped at Eden Prairie Center in a Minneapolis suburb, and the site is being redeveloped for a Scheels destination superstore.

Seritage Growth Properties is demolishing a Sears and Auto Center next to Aventura Mall in suburban Miami and building an open-air retail shopping village called Esplanade Aventura.

Also, a multimillion-dollar redevelopment of a former Sears and tire center in Little Rock, Ark., is underway, and the 30-acre site will become home to new restaurants, shops and hotels.

These redevelopments fit within a larger trend toward making shopping more of an experience.

"That's really the trend for all retail real estate now," Leach says. "Everything you're hearing about and reading about is finding ways to bring customers to the mall for an experience rather than just to shop." Now, the malls have to have a restaurant, entertainment uses and some type of technology-related experience to get people to come and stay rather than sit at home and shop online.

"Landlords that have a Sears are going to be challenged to find those entertainment uses to backfill what Sears once occupied," Leach adds.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Lampert steps down as Sears chairman
February 16, 2019

Eddie Lampert is stepping down as chairman of Sears' board, according to a company filing. The filing states:

"On February 12, 2019, Edward S. Lampert, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (the 'Board'), and Kunal S. Kamlani, a director on the Board, each notified the Company of his decision to step down from the Board, effective immediately. Their resignations relate to the completion of the Going Concern Transaction and are not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices. Mr. Lampert is Chairman of the board of directors, and Mr. Kamlani is President, of ESL."

Lampert, whose hedge fund won a $5.2B auction for the retailer last month, already stepped down as CEO when Sears filed for bankruptcy last year

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Lampert completes acquisition of Sears; chain to conduct CEO search
By Marianne Wilson
Chain Store Age
February 12, 2019

It's official: ESL Investments, the hedge fund run by Sears Holdings Corp. chairman Eddie Lampert, has completed its acquisition of the bankrupt company for approximately $5.2 billion.

Last week, a bankruptcy court judge approved ESL's offer, clearing the way for Sears to exit bankruptcy and remain in business as a going concern. Following its ongoing (and previously announced) round of store closures, the new Sears will be made up of 223 Sears and 202 Kmart stores, along with such brands and operating businesses as Kenmore, DieHard, Craftsman, Sears Home Services, Sears Auto Centers and Innovel.

The company will be led by the same management team that constituted the "Office of the Chief Executive" of Sears Holdings, consisting of Robert A. Riecker, CFO; Leena Munjal, chief digital officer; and Greg Ladley, president, softlines. (The office was put in place when Lampert stepped down as CEO.). Sears said it intends to conduct a search for a CEO with a record of success "in managing platform businesses and effectuating large-scale dynamic transformations."

"The best possible outcome has now been realized for all stakeholders, including Sears' many associates, Shop Your Way members, vendors and other partners," Lampert, CEO of ESL., said in a statement. "ESL looks forward to a new era at Sears and Kmart that builds on their proud histories, while finding new ways to innovate and grow to adapt to the forces transforming the retail industry. We are ready for this exciting opportunity to help return Sears to profitability and will apply ourselves every day in pursuit of that goal."

A new entity, Transform Holdco, will be the holding company for the rescued chain and keep all existing customer experience and agreements intact for a "seamless transition," the statement said. As of the closing of the acquisition, the new Sears had more than $400 million in excess availability on its new asset-backed credit facility, which provides a significant runway to pay assumed liabilities and execute go-forward initiatives, including investments in new, smaller stores to expand its reach in the hardlines category.

In a statement, the company moves forward from the Chapter 11 process positioned for success with:

   • A footprint of profitable retail stores, a robust digital platform and an integrated ecosystem of businesses that drive franchise value;
   • A healthier capital structure, including a reduced debt load, that creates the liquidity necessary to invest in its go-forward plan;
   • Initiatives to drive margin & EBITDA growth, including technology investments, inventory optimization and Sears Home Services enhancements;
   • Significantly reduced SG&A expense;
   • Strong brand recognition and market positions in key segments, appliances;
   • No. 3 appliance retailer in the U.S.;
   • No. 1 home service and direct delivery provider, including for leading third-party retailers; and
   • No. 1 provider of appliance and lawn & garden parts for the DIY community.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

J.C. Penney to drop major appliances after a 3-year run
By Anne D'Innocenzio
Chicago Sun-Times
February 10, 2019

J.C. Penney will no longer be selling major appliances, ending its three-year run.

The Plano, Texas-based department store chain also says on its company blog that furniture will only be available on its website and store locations in Puerto Rico.

The move marks the first major initiative by the company's new CEO Jill Soltau to try to turn around J.C. Penney's business. The company has been trying to claw its way back after a disastrous reinvention plan in 2012 by its former CEO Ron Johnson, who dramatically cut back on temporary promotions and brought in new brands to attract young shoppers. Since then, the retailer's business has stabilized but is still weak as it struggles to figure out its identity.

Major appliances will be discontinued as of Feb. 28. J.C. Penney says it wants to go back to focusing on its heritage of fashion and home furnishings, which carry higher profit margins. The company says it's completing a new store layout, including the reduction of space previously dedicated to appliance and furniture showrooms.

Under former CEO Marvin Ellison, J.C. Penney returned to selling major appliances after 33 years to decrease its reliance on fashion and respond to shifting consumer habits. It also was hoping to capitalize on the woes of Sears, which had ceded market share in this category to new players like Home Depot and Best Buy. Sears filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy last October and its fate is uncertain.

Appliances, however, are not a big traffic driver since shoppers buy them every few years.

Penney is set to report its fiscal fourth-quarter earnings results on Feb. 28.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Just Avoided Liquidation - But Workers Have a List of Demands
By Jennifer Calfas
February 8, 2019

It's a bittersweet feeling for Sears and Kmart employees as the billionaire who oversaw the shuttering of hundreds of stores and elimination of hundreds and thousands of jobs now ushers the storied retailer into a new era.

Current and former employees who spoke with MONEY throughout Sears' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings say they worry about what the future of the company would look like under Sears Chairman Eddie Lampert's ownership.

And now, those concerns have become reality.

This week, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge officially approved Lampert's $5.2 billion bid to save 425 Sears and Kmart stores and roughly 45,000 jobs from liquidation. Lampert's bid, which he made through his hedge fund ESL Investments Inc., was the only one that would have kept Sears alive and was met with staunch opposition from Sears' unsecured creditors, who called Lampert's plan a "scheme to rob Sears and its creditors of assets."

As CEO and Chairman, Lampert's reign at Sears led to cost-cutting efforts that resulted in a decline in sales, store closures, and inventory reductions. Current and former employees say they saw their hours shortened, benefits lessened, and wages stifled in the process. During bankruptcy proceedings, creditors and employees accused Lampert of profiting off of the company’s demise.

(Representatives from ESL and Sears Holdings did not respond immediately to requests for comment.)

Since the company filed for bankruptcy in October 2018, current and former employees say their jobs were "tossed around like a volleyball by Eddie Lampert," as they wrote in a letter to the court earlier this week. In 2018 alone, more than 10,016 employees were laid off as a result of hundreds of store closures, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based career transitioning firm. More than 4,880 of those jobs were eliminated when the company filed for bankruptcy, and dozens of stores are still slated to close come March.

"I've already been working with him as a CEO, and I didn't see any improvement since he got there," says Victor Urquidez, an assistant manager at a Sears Auto Center in California who also co-wrote the letter. "I think there won't be any difference. We won't be expecting any changes."

With Lampert's bid the only viable option to keep Sears alive, employees say they felt stuck and powerless through bankruptcy proceedings: Would they rather lose their jobs and the company they devoted their careers to entirely, or continue to work for the man they believe drove the company into the ground?

With the latter as their new reality, employees say they won't stand idly by. They want accountability from management - and here's how they're hoping to get it.

Severance pay for laid-off workers

In a letter to the bankruptcy court judge this week, employees said Lampert should meet with them "to listen to our ideas and concerns."

One of the biggest concerns for workers in the last several months has been securing severance pay. A number of laid-off retail employees told MONEY these last several months that they stopped receiving or never received severance pay as a result of bankruptcy proceedings.

As part of Lampert's approved bid, he included a $40 million severance pay fund that would cover "certain severance costs incurred by Sears during bankruptcy and reinstate severance benefits for eligible employees in a new company," according to his hedge fund.

Terry Leiker, a laid-off Sears employee who worked there for 17 years, never received her severance pay after her job ended the day before the company filed for bankruptcy. Now, she's struggling to find a new job and collecting unemployment checks.

"We're owed that money," Leiker says. "We're the ones that made Eddie the millions that he has. We deserve it. We worked hard for it."

Workers are also asking for an additional financial hardship fund to be created to help ease the transition for laid-off employees as they seek their next job. As for the severance pay fund that Lampert already guaranteed, it's unclear when that money will be doled out now that Lampert's bid has been officially approved.

Employee representation on the corporate board

To ensure their voices are heard, employees say they should have a seat on the board.

That position would "ensure the survival and viability of the company is prioritized over short-term benefits for (Lampert) and other shareholders," says Rise Up Retail, a labor group that has worked with Sears and Kmart employees throughout bankruptcy proceedings.

Worker representation on corporate boards is not a new idea - but is one seldom adopted in the United States. Senators like Tammy Baldwin and Elizabeth Warren have proposed requirements along these lines in recent months, and the concept is fairly popular among Democratic voters, according to Civis Analytics.

But, it's not exactly clear what employee board representation would look like. Germany is seen as the model for these efforts, and workers there don't have representation on the corporate board of directors. Instead, they are represented on a supervisory board, according to Harvard Business Review.

Separate the positions of CEO and Chairperson

Lampert served as chairman and CEO of Sears from 2013 to late 2018, when he stepped down from the CEO position when bankruptcy proceedings began. Separating these positions, workers say, would lead to greater accountability.

Gabe McGuire, a Kmart employee whose store in North Carolina is set to close in March, says Lampert's position in both of these roles previously presented several conflicts of interest. "It's kind of like he's monitoring himself," McGuire says. "I don't see how that isn't a conflict of interest."

More companies are moving toward separating these two positions, according to a 2016 paper published by the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University. Just over half of S&P 500 Index companies were led by individuals who carried both the CEO and chairperson titles, the paper says. Fifteen years prior, 77% of these companies had that type of leadership.

The paper does note, however, that there is "little evidence that chairman/CEO duality is on average detrimental to future performance or governance quality."

Employees, however, believe that at Sears, the separation could help them achieve their larger goal in this new era: accountability.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears will stay in business; Bankruptcy Court approves Chairman Edward Lampert's plan to buy struggling retailer
By Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz
Chicago Tribune
February 7, 2019

A plan to keep Sears Holdings Corp. alive and tens of thousands of people employed was approved Thursday by a federal Bankruptcy Court judge.

Judge Robert Drain of U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York approved Sears Chairman and former CEO Edward Lampert's bid to buy the retail chain's assets for $5.2 billion.

Lampert's purchase, made through his hedge fund, ESL Investments, is intended to keep 425 Sears and Kmart stores open, preserving some 45,000 jobs. It was the only plan submitted that would have kept the once-mighty department store giant in business and avoid liquidation.

Lampert's plan was opposed by a committee of unsecured creditors skeptical that Hoffman Estates-based Sears will be any more successful after exiting bankruptcy. The committee pushed for a liquidation, arguing that shutting down the company and selling its assets could recover more of what Sears owes.

Still unresolved is a dispute between Sears and ESL over which is responsible for paying $166 million for inventory received after Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Oct. 15. Although Drain did not have jurisdiction to decide the issue, he gave an advisory opinion in favor of Sears' claim that ESL is responsible for those liabilities.

"I am more than reasonably confident that that would be the result in a contested manner brought before the court," Drain said.

Drain's approval of Lampert's bid came the same day that Sears' largest unsecured creditor, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., withdrew its objection after reaching an agreement over $1.7 billion it said it was owed.

The federal agency, which guarantees individuals' pension plans if an insured plan shuts down without enough money to cover benefits, reduced its claim to $800 million, Sears attorney Ray Schrock told the judge Thursday.

The agreement clears the way for the insurer to assume responsibility for Sears' two pension plans, the agency said in a statement. The agency said last month that it would seek to take over Sears' plans, which cover more than 90,000 people.

The judge's decision saves Sears from liquidation, but still unanswered is whether Lampert will reinvigorate a retail chain with which many consumers have fond memories, but no current relationship. Lampert has said he wants to invest smaller stores and those that are profitable, with a focus on popular categories like appliances and repair services.

As of October, the company had 687 Sears and Kmart stores, down from 1,672 stores in January 2016. Another 262 stores have closed or are expected to close by March.

ESL has said the new company would be able to make more investments in new initiatives and get better terms with vendors after shedding debt and pension obligations. In his bid, Lampert said he would cut overhead expenses in half.

Despite the plan's approval, "major hurdles to its long term business remain," Moody's department store analyst Christina Boni said in a statement.

"Scale, which is a critical to competing in retail today, will be lacking and its core customer proposition still remains in question," she said. "Further shrinking of the store base and cost reductions may be required as profitability remains elusive."

Sears Holdings has lost more than $11 billion since 2011. Lampert, who stepped down as CEO when the company filed for bankruptcy protection, has been trying to right the ship at Sears for years amid tough competition from rivals like Amazon, Walmart and Target.

Lampert engineered Kmart's $11 billion acquisition of Sears in 2005 and, through his hedge fund, is the company's largest shareholder. He has said he's provided Sears with more than $2.4 billion in loans and other forms of financing over the last several years.

ESL plans to finance a portion of its purchase by trading $1.3 billion in Sears debt it holds for ownership in the reorganized company. The court clarified this week that the bid does not require the company to release Lampert and ESL from liability related to transactions between the hedge fund and the retailer prior to the bankruptcy filing.

ESL, in its business plan for the new Sears, said the new company would be able to make more investments in new initiatives and get better terms with vendors after shedding debt and pension obligations.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears shares surge as bankruptcy judge OKs Lampert bid
By Wallace Witkowski
February 7, 2019

Sears Holdings Corp. shares rallied Thursday as a bankruptcy judge approved Edward Lampert's bid to purchase the ailing retailer for $5.2 billion. Sears shares surged 32% to close at 76 cents. Judge Robert Drain said he would approve Lampert's purchase, allowing Sears to keep 425 stores open, preserving about 45,000 jobs, according to a Dow Jones report.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Chairman Eddie Lampert could save the brand - or doom it
By Martha C. White
NBC News
February 6, 2019

Some retail experts said Lampert's moves over the years were intended to extract value for himself at the expense of other stakeholders.

A diverse group of players is engaged in a tug-of-war for the beleaguered Sears brand. Analysts are skeptical that the retail icon can stage a rebound, even if its board and controversial chairman manages to stave off liquidation this week. The chance for long-term viability, they say, might already be in the rear-view mirror.

In a bankruptcy court hearing this week, Sears chairman Eddie Lampert is fighting to get the bid of approximately $5.2 billion he made for the company last month to be approved. Supporters, including Sears' board, say the move would save the jobs of 45,000 workers. In exchange, Sears would sell its assets to Lampert's ESL Investments hedge fund, including the remaining 425 stores.

The department store's unsecured creditors have pushed back on the plan, arguing that they would be better able to recoup some of their losses if the company is liquidated now - before any more value is transferred to Lampert or entities controlled by him. Those creditors have labeled the $5.2 billion lifeline as "nothing but the final fulfillment of a years-long scheme to deprive Sears and its creditors of assets and its employees of jobs while lining Lampert's and ESL's own pockets."

An additional wrinkle is Sears' underfunded retirement plan, which covers roughly 90,000 former workers and is backstopped by the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., to which Sears gave some intellectual property rights to the Kenmore and DieHard brands as collateral. Under Lampert's proposed rescue plan, which the PBGC also is fighting in court, ESL would gain control of those brands, potentially undercutting any claim the agency might have on them.

Lampert has a long, and rocky, history with the retailer. In 2005, he spearheaded a merger of Sears and Kmart. At the time, the two brands combined had approximately 3,500 stores and were expected to generate $55 billion in annual sales. Lampert is Sears Holding Corporation's chairman as well as former CEO and largest shareholder. At the time of its bankruptcy filing, Lampert and ESL also were the company's largest creditor.

Retail analysts tend to agree that Lampert is the only one with the means - or the desire - to save the storied brand in the short term, but suggest he oversold his ability to turn around the struggling retailer. "Lampert's always been the savior of Sears in his own eyes... [He] is really the one responsible for Sears' demise," said Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData Retail.

Saunders said Lampert's strategy was flawed from the start. "Really, the start of the serious problems was the merger with Kmart," he said. "Two under-performing companies were put together on the idea that there could be economies of scale... That never proves to be the case."

Analysts blame Lampert for compounding the problem by under-investing in Sears while aggressively pursuing cost cuts that limited its ability to be competitive. "In our view the company will continue to be hobbled by the same untenable problems," Moody's Investors Service Vice President Christina Boni wrote in a recent research note.

Even if the bankruptcy court agrees to Lampert's $5.2 billion deal - which Lampert acknowledged could see the closure of hundreds more stores - shrinking the way back to profitability is an exercise in futility, Boni said, given the squeeze from Amazon and other online as well as brick-and-mortar competitors.

"Today in retail you'll see that scale definitely matters," Boni said. "We're seeing that larger retailers are having a better time making and leveraging those investments."

Other analysts and retail experts also expressed skepticism that any leadership team helmed by Lampert could accomplish a last-ditch turnaround. Even Democratic presidential hopeful for 2020 Elizabeth Warren weighed in: The Massachusetts senator accused Lampert in a letter last week of enriching himself at the expense of workers. Sears, she wrote, "appears to be suffering from a unique set of problems as a result of your leadership."

Warren acknowledges that Lampert's proposal would save jobs in the immediate future, but cast doubt on his willingness or ability to stabilize the company in the long term.

"I am concerned that under your leadership, Sears may continue to struggle and employees will continue to face uncertainty and anxiety over their future employment, and ongoing risks to their benefits and economic security," she wrote.

"There are business ethics questions on both sides of that debate," said Greg Portell, lead partner in the global consumer and retail practice at consulting firm A.T. Kearney. Abandoning the pension fund could give the retailer a fresh start that might keep employees at their jobs, but at the expense of retirees. If the deal falls through, creditors and retirees will stand a better chance of cutting their losses, but workers will be out of luck.

Some experts suggested that financial maneuvers over the years - cutting costs, closing stores, selling real estate holdings to a trust controlled by Lampert, spinning off brand assets like Lands' End and Craftsman - were intended by design to extract value on behalf of Lampert's various business interests and at the expense of other stakeholders.

Theresa Williams, clinical associate professor of marketing at Indiana University's Kelley School of Business, pointed to the brand's recent history and previous promises of a turnaround that never materialized. "We just came off the best retail year we’ve had in eight years and there was zero evidence that they made any headway," she said.

"This latest effort is no different than any of the other strategies Lampert has employed since the beginning. It's been a money grab from the start," Williams said. "[He] leveraged every single asset to the max to his financial benefit or to ESL's benefit."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sen. Warren decries Lampert's bid to own Sears
By Lauren Coleman-Lochner and Eliza Ronalds-Hannon
February 1, 2019

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a possible Democratic presidential candidate, slammed Lampert in a letter dated Wednesday, citing the "inherent conflicts of interest" in the hedge fund manager's takeover of bankrupt Sears Holdings Corp.

Warren calling out a billionaire isn't necessarily surprising -- she's proposed a tax on the super-wealthy and describes herself as a champion of America's middle class. What's unusual is that Lampert made saving thousands of jobs a centerpiece of his winning bid for parts of the 126-year-old retail icon.

In the letter to Lampert, who ran the company until last year and remains its chairman, Warren questioned his "commitment to the company's employees given your history of slashing jobs."

Sears "appears to be suffering from a unique set of problems as a result of your leadership -- and now it appears that the same company you brought to the brink of liquidation could be back in your control without any substantial changes in leadership or governance," Warren wrote. She added: "It appears that you have enriched yourself while driving the company into bankruptcy."

Economic Inequality

Warren's salvo is another sign that Democratic lawmakers are serious about making economic inequality a political issue ahead of the 2020 presidential election. A special concern for Warren, a former Harvard Law School professor, and others is the treatment of workers in bankruptcy, where U.S. law focuses on reimbursements to bondholders while people rendered jobless by a company’s collapse are left to fend for themselves.

Lampert's hedge fund, ESL Investments Inc., said in a statement that it's reviewing the letter.

Growing Concern

"Our going-concern bid for the assets of Sears Holdings in a transparent, court-supervised auction reflects our belief in the potential to create a successful company that can benefit from the changes in today's retail environment," ESL said in the statement. "It offers Sears the only long-term opportunity to save and create jobs, honor the extended warranties that were purchased by so many customers, generate new value and grow."

Sears paid almost $5 billion into worker pension plans during Lampert's tenure and ESL was "a constant source of funding" for the retailer, lending $2.4 billion, the hedge fund said. As for the allegations of conflict of interest, also leveled by a creditors' committee, ESL said they are "misleading or wrong" and vowed to address them in court.

The liquidation of Toys "R" Us Inc. looms over bankrupt Sears. The toy-store chain's employees were able to negotiate a $20 million hardship fund for themselves with the company's private equity owners. To help consummate the deal, they paid an August visit to Capitol Hill, where they met with presidential hopefuls Kirsten Gillibrand and Cory Booker. In their purple and blue company T-shirts, the workers pleaded for limits on leverage in private equity buyouts and protections like profit clawbacks that could generate money to help other laid-off workers. Warren called for lenders to contribute to the hardship fund.

Toys 'R' Us Workers Go to Congress to Seek Curbs on Buyout Firms

The publicity, and the workers' success, created tension in the Sears bankruptcy case. Bankers worried they'd be blamed for firings if they didn't support Lampert's bid for Sears. Judge Robert Drain told stakeholders that "it would be a very good thing" if the company could preserve most of the remaining jobs.

Staying Alive

Lampert and his hedge fund moved to keep Sears alive earlier this month by buying it out of bankruptcy and giving it a new corporate parent. His $5.2 billion proposal cleared one hurdle Jan. 16, and will likely be formally green-lit in court on Monday.

All this despite protests from Sears creditors, including some landlords, vendors and the U.S. agency overseeing its pension fund. An official creditor group has objected to the bid. They say Lampert has pillaged Sears for more than a decade, and have threatened to sue him over controversial past transactions.

Warren raised similar concerns in her letter.

"The inherent conflicts of interest and the decisions you made while running the company have short-changed Sears workers, leaving a company with a long, proud history in American retail on its last legs," she wrote.

Meanwhile, about three dozen former and current employees of Sears and its corporate sibling, Kmart, marched up Seventh Avenue in Manhattan Thursday to a Kmart store, where they outnumbered the shoppers. They chanted, "Beat back the Wall Street attack," and said they wanted more protective laws for workers.

Midterm elections intensified the pressure to rethink the norms of capitalism. Democrats won control of the House of Representatives, and candidates jockeying to take on President Donald Trump in 2020 aren't being shy about staking out their positions. Warren earlier this week proposed a so-called "ultra-millionaire tax" on households worth at least $50 million.

Warren ended the letter to Lampert with eight queries, including whether Lampert would commit to a five-year pause on share buybacks and provide details of his plans to avoid conflicts of interest and invest in the company. She requested a response by Feb. 14.

"I believe in capitalism," Warren told Bloomberg TV on Wednesday, "but capitalism without rules is theft."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Big Sears creditor objects to Lampert's bid
By Ben Miller
Chicago Business Journal
January 28, 2019

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a U.S. government agency that protects the pension benefits of private-sector pension plans, is objecting to the planned purchase of Sears Holding Co. by its chairman, Eddie Lampert.

Earlier this month, Lampert and his ESL Investments hedge fund proposed a $5.2 billion bid for the bankrupt Hoffman Estates, Illinois-based retailer that will keep more than 400 stores open and save nearly 50,000 jobs.

But last week an official committee of unsecured creditors opposed Lampert's bid. They allege in court filings in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in White Plains, New York that "years of misconduct" by Lampert led to the demise of Sears, and that Lampert's been bleeding the company for the past few years.

Now, the government pension protector PBGC is opposing the bid.

After Sears filed for bankruptcy protection on Oct. 15, PBGC said "if circumstances require, we are prepared to step in and provide PBGC-guaranteed benefits. The plans, which cover about 90,000 workers and retirees, are underfunded by about $1.5 billion."

On Jan. 18, PBGC said it was taking responsibility for Sears Holdings Corp.'s two defined benefit pension plans.

Although it's a government agency, PBGC said it "receives no taxpayer dollars. Its operations are financed by insurance premiums, investment income, and, for the single-employer program, assets and recoveries from failed single-employer plans."

Before Sears announced its bankruptcy, PBGC "obtained an interest in the company's Kenmore and DieHard trademarks," according to The Wall Street Journal, and that interest would be lost if the bankruptcy court accepted Lampert's buyout offer for Sears.

On Saturday, the PBGC filed with the bankruptcy court its objections to Lampert's bid.

"PBGC has joint and several claims against each of the debtors (Lampert and ESL) and KCD (Kenmore Craftsman DieHard) in the estimated amount of $1,737,500,000. In light of these circumstances, PBGC objects to the Proposed Cure Amount (Lampert and his bid placed the value of the Kenmore and DieHard trademarks at $0)," PBGC said in its filing.

Lampert and ESL didn't have a comment for the Journal on the PBGC court filing but last week, in response to the official committee of unsecured creditors' allegations that Lampert was trying to "steal the remaining assets of Sears," an ESL spokesman said the "processes we followed are unimpeachable."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Creditors Challenge Retailer's Sale to Lampert
By Peg Brickley & Soma Biswas
The Wall Street Journal
January 25, 2019

Sears's creditors outline how the billionaire's hedge fund profited from stock buybacks, spinoffs and interest charges

Sears Holdings Corp. Chairman Edward Lampert and his hedge fund ESL Investments Inc. deployed stock buybacks, spinoffs and dividends to rake in billions of dollars while stripping the 126-year-old company of assets and cash, according to an investigation by the retailer's creditors.

In a court filing challenging the planned sale of Sears to Mr. Lampert, the official committee of unsecured creditors tracked what it claims was a deliberate strategy that began in 2005, shortly after the billionaire took charge of what was then a profitable company. They allege he spun out businesses and collected dividends, and that he made loans and collected interest and fees on them. Creditors want court permission to sue Mr. Lampert and his hedge fund.

Mr. Lampert has repeatedly denied accusations that he steered Sears into ruin for his own benefit. When he made money selling off the company's real estate and businesses, so did other shareholders, he has said.

An ESL spokesman on Thursday said the committee's statements "are misleading or just flat wrong." The spokesman also referred to previous comments describing the deals as fair and beneficial to all Sears stakeholders, adding that the "processes we followed are unimpeachable."

Creditors said in their filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in White Plains, N.Y., that Sears spent most of its cash between 2005 and 2008-$6 billion-on share buybacks instead of investing in stores. Once the cash was depleted, Sears began spinning off businesses, and finally, started borrowing from ESL. The spinoffs of Sears Hometown, Sears Canada , Lands' End and Seritage added more than $4 billion to Sears's coffers, the company's annual reports show.

In just the past five years, ESL has walked away with at least $700 million in dividends, fees and interest on loans that the hedge fund made to Sears, creditors said in their filing.

Mr. Lampert still owns valuable stakes in companies built on Sears's real estates and businesses. Sears's shareholders, meanwhile, have seen their stockholdings plunge.

Mr. Lampert is set to ask a bankruptcy judge on Feb. 4 to sign off on the $5.2 billion deal that gives him more than 400 stores in exchange for a series of agreements to absorb some of Sears's bills, including $1.3 billion that he says the company owes him. Key to the buyout is a settlement in which Sears agreed not to challenge his right to bid with debt instead of cash. Mr. Lampert agreed to pay $35 million for that settlement, which averts any risk that the company will challenge the validity of the $1.3 billion loan from Lampert affiliates to Sears.

Lawyers for creditors, meanwhile, want to proceed with a suit attacking the validity of Mr. Lampert's loans. They say Sears was in such bad financial shape that those loans should be characterized as capital contributions, and written off, instead of repaid. Such a suit is worth more than the $35 million settlement, they said.

Mr. Lampert has directed the company to spin off its best assets over the past seven years to shareholders-the biggest of which was ESL itself-and those spinoffs provided "substantial profits" to ESL, creditors claim in their court papers.

ESL said Thursday that it has provided Sears with much-needed financing, including $2.4 billion in various loans and debt. "These financings and other transactions involving Sears' assets were undertaken to facilitate the company's continued operations and implement its transformation plan," ESL said.

Creditors allege that the hedge fund also made money on Sears through stock buybacks, thought these also enriched other shareholders. Instead of investing in its stores, Sears spent most of its cash on hand on buybacks, the committee said. The buybacks boosted Sears's share price, making Mr. Lampert's holdings more valuable, while also entitling ESL to collect higher fees from its hedge-fund investors, according to the committee's complaint.

Once Sears was drained of cash, it was ripe for asset-stripping, creditors contend.

Sears got less than it should have for valuable businesses-from the Lands' End apparel and home-goods unit to Sears Canada to some of its most valuable real estate-the complaint says. Creditors say ESL paid little or nothing for stakes in businesses that boomed in value.

ESL became the majority shareholder of Sears Hometown & Outlet Stores, for example, after a rights offering in 2012 that was allegedly priced low. On the first day of trading, the share price doubled and ESL chalked up a one-day profit of $226.5 million, court papers say.

In the same court filing, ESL also noted that proceeds of some of loans were used to pay certain creditors such as the company's defined-benefit pension fund.

This is not the first time unsecured creditors committee has made these allegations against ESL. In a court filing in November, ESL responded to similar charges, saying its investments in Sears, including loans to Sears, "provided a runway for Sears to implement its strategic turnaround plan and did not result in any 'windfall for ESL.'"

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

PBGC to Pay Pension Benefits for Employees and Retirees at Sears and Kmart
January 18, 2019

WASHINGTON - The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is taking steps to assume responsibility for Sears Holdings Corporation's two defined benefit pension plans, which cover about 90,000 people. The national retail chain headquartered in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, operates through its subsidiaries, which include Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation.

Sears filed for Chapter 11 protection on October 15, 2018. PBGC is stepping in to become responsible for the company's two pension plans because it is clear that Sears' continuation of the plans is no longer possible.

"Our mission is to protect the retirement income of plan participants and their families," said PBGC Director Tom Reeder. "When it's no longer possible for plan sponsors to maintain their pension plans, PBGC plays the crucial role of providing lifetime retirement income for the workers and retirees."

PBGC has worked with Sears for several years to improve funding for the company's plans. PBGC estimates that the Sears' plans are underfunded by $1.4 billion leaving them 64 percent funded.

PBGC is seeking to terminate the plans as of January 31,2019. The agency will become responsible for the pension plans when Sears agrees or a court orders plan termination.

Until PBGC assumes responsibility for the pension plans, they remain the responsibility of Sears Holdings Corporation.

Retirees will continue to receive benefits without interruption, and future retirees can apply for benefits as soon as they are eligible. Sears pension plan participants with questions about their benefits should contact Sears Holdings Pension Service Center at 1-800-953-5390, Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Central Time.

PBGC covers Sears' two pension plans under its Single-Employer Insurance Program. Benefit accruals under the plans have been frozen since 2005. PBGC expects that its guarantees will cover the vast majority of pension benefits earned under these plans.

Termination of the Sears pension plans will not have a significant effect on PBGC's financial statements because the claim was previously included in the agency's fiscal year 2017 and 2018 financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

About PBGC:

PBGC protects the pension benefits of nearly 37 million Americans in private-sector pension plans. The agency operates two separate insurance programs - one covering pension plans sponsored by a single-employer and another covering multiemployer pension plans, which are sponsored by more than one employer and maintained under collective bargaining agreements. PBGC is currently responsible for the benefits of about 1.5 million people in failed pension plans. PBGC receives no taxpayer dollars. Its operations are financed by insurance premiums, investment income, and, for the Single-Employer Program, assets and recoveries from failed single-employer plans.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Holdings: You Missed The Big Short, Don't Miss The Big Long
By Eric Moore
Seeing Alpha
January 17, 2019


The 5.2 billion-dollar bid by ESL will be approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

The common stock of SHLDQ will not be wiped out, but all shareholders should buy Warrants and Unsecured 12/15/2019 Bonds to protect against dilution.

The 2nd Lien 10/15/2018 Bonds are worth par plus accrued interest.

Eddie Lampert has not been self-dealing. All shareholders received a pro rata share of all spin-offs.

The financial media and mainstream press have been preaching doom and gloom about the Sears for years, mainly based on the drastic decline in revenue and stock price over the last seven years. However, the accusations that Eddie Lampert has committed fraud or has asset stripped the company are just absurd. Eddie Lampert is not Gordon Gecko.

Nothing in his history shows that he has been unfair to partners, investors, employees or fellow shareholders. Some of his ideas at Sears Holdings did not work, maybe he closed the losing stores to slow, perhaps he bought back stock to high a price (only time will tell). With all this considered, loaning the company money does not make him a crook or some sort of corporate raider. He has invested more than anyone and, therefore has more to lose. He should be able to credit bid his debt to purchase assets.

The media has been unfair to Eddie Lampert

The same media that hailed Eddie Lampert as the "The Next Warren Buffett" in Magazine Cover stories a few years ago, now say at best case he is a corporate raider (similar to Gordon Gecko in the film Wall Street) that asset-stripped Sears of all the good parts and drove the company into bankruptcy.

At worst case, they say he is a hedge fund fool who tried to turn around a failing retailer. Neither are true. He is a relentless genius who refuses to give up. He has a vision and come hell or high water (or bankruptcy), he will see it through. The media has been biased on anything Eddie Lampert or Sears related since at least 2015. No other retailer or hedge fund manager has been treated with such disdain and vitriol.

I still believe Eddie Lampert is the shareholders' most valuable asset. He has major skin in the game. At last year's annual meeting, Eddie said that SHLD will continue to shrink until it is profitable. I mentioned in a previous article that we needed roughly 400 stores, Shop Your Way, Diehard, Kenmore, and Eddie at the Helm to be profitable again. Ironically, that appears to be what Newco will consist of. It's so exciting to be buying at these low prices.

Sears Holdings: The Big Long

I believe Sears Holdings is a much better investment than GGP, the detractors and naysayers say based on the Chapter 11 filing. I should admit I am wrong about my sum of the parts thesis and the value in SHLD.

However, the drop in stock price and bonds makes the opportunity even greater. I still see significant value in the Bonds, Warrants, and Common stock based on the amount of the ESL Bid and the long-term prospects of Sears Reinsurance and a nearly debt-free Newco. You clearly can't pay over 5 billion dollars for a company worth zero on a going forward basis.

Assuming most of the debt that is not already (PIK) Paid in Kind will be converted into Newco equity, the new entity will emerge or go public:

A. With no pension payments for two years (The pension is still underfunded but paid up until at least 2020)

B. With no taxes for years (the NOLs are over five billion dollars)

C. With no significant interest payments (most bondholders and other debt would be converted into stock)

D. No lease payments from hundreds of closed stores

The Reorganization Plan is Due February 18

1. I believe the common stock will be diluted, receive a percentage of Newco and warrants and/or evidence of indebtedness certificates but will not be wiped out

2. The 12/15/2019 Bonds are worth par (for a return of 13X at today's price)

3. The 2nd lien 10/15/2018 Bonds are worth par (for a return of 5X at today's price)

The unsecured creditors committee allege they have found proof of potential self-dealing by ESL and/or Eddie Lampert. I vehemently disagree and will make the legal case again below.

Eddie Lampert has not been Self-Dealing

Below is the standard for self-dealing and the relevant case law.

a. The controlling stockholder is on both sides of the transaction and dictated its terms; and

b. There is a special benefit to the controlling stockholder in which the minority stockholders do not share.

Sinclair Oil, 280 A.2d at 720-22; Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 490 A.2d 1050 (Del. Ch. 1984), aff'd, 575 A.2d 1131 (Del. 1990).

If the benefit is shared with the minority, self-dealing generally will not be found, even if the controlling stockholder acted to advance its own interests.

For example: in Sinclair Oil, the controlling stockholder needed cash and caused the company to issue large dividends, which were proportionately shared with the minority stockholders. Although this action drained the company of some cash and hurt expansion opportunities, no self-dealing was found because there was no detriment to the minority stockholders as they shared in the dividend proportionately. Id. at 720-22 ("The dividends resulted in great sums of money being transferred from Sinven to Sinclair. However, a proportionate share of this money was received by the minority shareholders of Sinven. Sinclair received nothing from Sinven to the exclusion of its minority stockholders. As such, these dividends were not self-dealing.")

In the case of Sears shareholders, all minority Sears shareholders have participated in the spin-offs on a pari-passu basis, including the prize spin-off Seritage Growth Properties The claims that Seritage was sold far below its true value were already settled. No self-dealing will be found.

Even when loans were made, shareholders were allowed to participate on a pari-passu basis when the 12/15/2019 Unsecured Bonds and warrants were offered in 2014. Recently in his blog, Eddie Lampert said:

"The Company has consistently discussed financing and capital structure alternatives with numerous banks and investors and we have worked hard to attract the most favorable financing possible. To date, ESL has been willing to provide financing on terms that were at least as favorable as might be achievable in the market and, when practical, was on a basis that allowed other investors to participate on the same terms."

The allegations that Eddie Lampert has cherry picked the best parts of Sears and left the carcass for shareholders and other creditors are utterly ridiculous. Some are suggesting the ESL loans should be treated as equity and subordinated. Equitable Subordination primarily occurs when fraud or a breach of fiduciary duty has occurred. Eddie Lampert has done neither.

The ESL Offer is for Substantially All the Assets of SHLD

The ESL bid Reads:

On January 9, 2019, Transform Holdco submitted a revised offer (The revised Proposal) to acquire Substantially all of the go-forward retail footprint and other assets and component businesses of Holdings as a going concern..

The words "substantially all" may seem insignificant until you read the Bond Documents. A provision in the Bond Indenture on page 30 entitled Limitation on Mergers and Sales of assets requires that if substantially all the assets of Sears are sold, the Bonds must be assumed by the purchaser, in this case, the ESL entity Transform Holdco. (see below)

Limitations on Mergers and Sales of Assets

The Indenture provides that the Company will not consolidate with or merge into another Person, or sell other than for cash or lease all or substantially all our assets to another Person, unless

• either the Company is the continuing Person, or the successor Person (if other than the Company) expressly assumes by supplemental indenture the obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the notes (in which case, except in the case of such a lease, we will be discharged from these obligations); and

• immediately after the merger, consolidation, sale or lease, no Default shall have occurred and be continuing.

This provision means that the added protection for bondholders is that the ESL offer of over 5.2 Billion triggers this part of the indenture, and therefore at worst case, Newco must assume the bonds as a part of the purchase. (The same provision exists in the 12/15/2019 Unsecured Bonds).

Bankruptcy judges can't just wipe out provisions in Bond Indentures, the secured Bonds and unsecured 12/15/2019 Bonds are worth par plus accrued interest (if used to exercise the warrants). I have found no Bankruptcy cases in which a bond indenture was just ignored or wiped out in Bankruptcy court.


If you want above average returns, you need to do deeper research, and thinking about the companies you invest in, you must learn to see what others don't see and/or refuse to see. You must understand the long game and what isn't obvious at first glance or on the surface.

In this case, people think SHLD is a "dying retailer" and it just may be, but when you see a brilliant guy like Eddie Lampert sticking with a company like SHLD for over a decade and not selling from a high of over $150 a share to a low of under .20 cents a share, it should make you look deeper.

I looked deeper and I clearly see what Eddie Lampert sees. Based on what I found, at these low prices, it is mathematically impossible to have a permanent loss of capital over the long term even if all the stores eventually fail, (as did the Textile mills owned by Berkshire Hathaway) that is a real margin of safety, the ability to make a profit even if the underlying business fails. (See Also Warren Buffett's investment in Blue Chip Stamps).

Eddie Lampert is a genius that can solve any problem SHLD has or could have had, he has chosen to buy the company out of Bankruptcy to save over 45,000 jobs and cut unnecessary expenses.

I never plan to sell my stock and will continue to buy as long as it is grossly undervalued.

Here is a clue: If you look beyond the retail business and look at what remains even if all the stores eventually fail, you will see that some of the current liabilities will actually transform into future assets for long-term shareholders.

I'm all in with Eddie Lampert and SHLDQ.

Disclosure: I am/we are long SHLDQ. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I provide consulting and research services to medium and large shareholders of SHLDQ and SRG,some of the information provided to my clients has not been published on Seeking Alpha and/or is published after it has been sent to them first.

* I have no association with ESL or Eddie Lampert, Bruce Berkowitz or Fairholme Funds

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Here's What Eddie Lampert Should Do With Sears Now
By Sarah Halzack
Daily Herald
January 17, 2019

He won his bid to save the storied department store. Here are three suggestions for giving it a fighting chance.

Sears Holdings Corp. will stay out of the retailing graveyard for a bit longer.

Eddie Lampert, the company's chairman and major shareholder, prevailed in a bankruptcy auction with a last-ditch plan to save the storied department store from liquidation and preserve thousands of jobs, Bloomberg News reported, citing a person with knowledge of the situation. He won out in part after sweetening his bid, now valued at more than $5 billion. The agreement, reached early Wednesday, still needs to be approved by the U.S. judge overseeing the bankruptcy.

Lampert may have beat out other bidders, but he hasn't exactly won himself a prize. Sears remains as troubled as ever, and this takeover won't change that. I still believe it's only a matter of time before the company winds up in liquidation.

Dead Store Walking

Sears has been unprofitable for many years, but has been kept afloat by Lampert lifelines. But this week's events got me thinking: What would I recommend Sears do at this point, if not to fully return to health, then at least to hang on a little longer? Here are three ideas:

MAKE A NOSTALGIA PLAY: Shopping at Sears now is a sad experience, but the department store occupies a distinct place in American history. Its Craftsman homes still dot our suburbs, the tower it built in Chicago is iconic (even if it no longer carries the retailer's name) and its catalogs were once a familiar fixture in our living rooms.

I know Sears doesn't have oodles of cash to throw at lavish marketing campaigns. But what if it stopped trying so hard to lure customers with Shop Your Way rewards - a program I have literally never heard a shopper rave about - and went for our heartstrings instead?

I'm imagining some ads showing the remarkable story of how Sears evolved from selling America horse buggies by catalog to offering us 4K TVs via our smartphones. Or maybe something with millennials and Gen X-ers sharing memories of making childhood Christmas lists from the Sears Wish Book, and grandparents recalling the pride they felt when they bought their first Craftsman toolbox. In other words, remind shoppers that many of them - with the exception of Gen Z-ers - probably have some latent affection or nostalgia for this brand.

WAVE THE WHITE FLAG OVER KMART: The discount chain is in a brutally competitive corner of retailing. Walmart Inc. and Target Corp. are in their best shape in years, and Dollar General Corp. is a retailing rock star that is blanketing America's rural areas at an astonishing pace. Kmart simply doesn't have a prayer of keeping up with them.

Kmart had only 360 locations as of August and has shuttered dozens of stores since then. It doesn't have the ubiquity and scale to compete on important offerings such as click-and-collect. And its gross margin lags that of Sears, presumably because a significant share of its business comes from the food-and-drug categories.

Kmart's Challenge

Kmart has lately had lower gross margin than Sears. Fierce discounting wars, as well as its reliance on grocery sales, make it hard to see how it could quickly improve on this. Maybe focusing on the Sears brand alone - and reaping savings from ceasing to operate Kmart stores - wouldn't be a bad idea.

THINK STRATEGICALLY ABOUT LABOR ALLOCATION: Sears won't be in a position to dole out generous raises, and I suspect many of its employees already are eyeing the exits. But it should do everything it can to make sure it puts its best workers in the places it can make the most difference.

Appliances are still a relative bright spot for Sears. And we've seen from the recent strength of Best Buy Co. how powerful it can be to focus on first-rate customer service when shoppers are making an expensive, highly considered purchase. Sears should make sure its most knowledgeable, consultative employees are stationed in the appliance section, in theory helping it score sales in a category where it still competes reasonably well.

Thanks, Kenmore

According to estimates from UBS, Sears Holdings still commands a healthy share of the major appliance market. Even if Sears does all of these things, its days are likely numbered. But if Lampert wants to feel like he truly gave the salvage effort his best shot, these are the things he ought to try.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Lampert wins bid to keep Sears alive
By Crain's Chicago Business
January 16, 2019

The company chairman won a bankruptcy auction with a plan that will keep the retailer in business and seek to save tens of thousands of jobs.

Eddie Lampert won a bankruptcy auction for Sears with a plan that will keep the retailer in business and seek to save tens of thousands of jobs, according to a person with knowledge of the discussions.

Lampert's bid prevailed over competing proposals from liquidators that would have forced the 126-year-old department store chain to shut down and sell its assets. The bid is valued at over $5 billion and represents an improvement of more than $150 million over the hedge fund manager's previous offer, the person said, asking not to be identified because the talks are confidential.

The agreement, reached in the wee hours of Wednesday, caps two days of discussions behind closed doors in New York to determine whether Sears would be worth more dead or alive. Sticking points during the talks had included whether Sears Chairman Lampert should be insulated from lawsuits over his previous turnaround deals for the company, Bloomberg previously reported. The final agreement doesn't include such a release for Lampert, the source said.

Representatives for Sears Holdings and at ESL Investments, the hedge fund run by Lampert that made the offer, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment outside business hours. The agreement still needs to be approved by the U.S. judge overseeing the bankruptcy.

ESL is Sears's biggest shareholder and creditor. Lampert now faces the challenge of returning a slimmed-down version of the company to profitability, after billions of losses under his management.

The winning bid is the latest in Lampert's long list of maneuvers to turn the company around. Since engineering the $12.3 billion acquisition of Sears by Kmart in 2005, Lampert has shuttered hundreds of money-losing stores, cut more than $1 billion in annual expenses, and spun off units such as Lands' End Inc.

The retailer, for years called Sears, Roebuck & Co. and famous for its massive catalog, boomed in the decades after World War II along with a growing middle class. But it wasn't able to keep up with shifting consumer habits as online rivals including Amazon.com Inc. siphoned off shoppers, while turnaround efforts were hobbled by mountains of debt.

Sears sold everything from Craftsman tools to Kenmore appliances, but it lost its footing in the 1980s with expansions into financial products such as banking, mortgages, insurance and credit cards. Walmart Inc. supplanted Sears as the biggest retailer in the early 1990s.

The company was started by Richard Sears, a train station agent in Minnesota who began selling watches by mail in 1886, according to its website. He soon partnered with watch repairman Alvah Roebuck.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears survives, what now?
By Clark Schultz
Seeking Alpha
January 16, 2019

Investors dabbling with the OTC-listed shares of Sears Holdings are seeing a 35% gain today off news that Eddie Lampert may in fact keep the department store chain alive in some form.

Some Sears creditors are expected to challenge the deal in front of the bankruptcy judge before Lampert can claim victory.

Even if Sears survives, skepticism persists within the retail industry. "While there is no doubt that a shrunken Sears will be more viable than the larger entity which struggled to turn a profit, we remain extremely pessimistic about the chain's future," writes GlobalData Retail managing director Neil Saunders.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg suggests that Lampert and team give up on the Kmart chain and its decimating margins.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Hoffman Estates on Sears' possible collapse: 'Village has survived tougher challenges'
By Eric Peterson & Elena Ferrarin
Daily Herald
January 9, 2019

Uncertainty over the fate of Sears Holdings found no resolution Tuesday, but Hoffman Estates officials emphasized there's no call to worry about the finances of the Northwest suburb where the longtime retail giant is headquartered.

"The village is fine and we're really more concerned about the employees who work there," Mayor Bill McLeod said.

Sears Chairman Eddie Lampert received another chance to save the 126-year-old company from liquidation as long as his hedge fund deposits $120 million by Wednesday afternoon in its bid to escape from bankruptcy.

An auction has been set for Jan. 14 to compare Lampert's bid with that of others more interested in liquidating Sears.

Whatever direction Sears' destiny takes, it will always be an important part of Hoffman Estates' history, McLeod said. Construction of its corporate headquarters in the early 1990s jump-started development of the village's western edge, he said.

Since then, it's attracted many other businesses to the area, including some leasing space on the Sears campus, McLeod said. He saw little danger of the buildings becoming vacant and ultimately razed, as was the fate of the former Allstate office campus in neighboring South Barrington.

"The campus is beautiful," McLeod said of the Sears site. "The buildings are beautiful."

The Sears campus occupies only about 200 acres of the nearly 800-acre economic development area the company spearheaded. The fate of that entire area will have more financial impact on Hoffman Estates than will the fate of the Sears campus alone, officials said.

"The village has survived tougher challenges, including the Great Recession," Village Manager Jim Norris said. "Sears has been a wonderful corporate citizen. We're hopeful that Sears will rise in form from the bankruptcy."

Indianapolis-based Simon Properties, which operates more than 200 retail centers across the nation, still had Sears stores at 29 of them at the end of September, including at Woodfield Mall in Schaumburg.

But Les Morris, director of corporate public relations, said it was too soon to guess the impact of Sears' bankruptcy on Simon's shopping centers.

"It's so fluid," Morris said, just after learning of Lampert's eleventh-hour reprieve. "I don't want to speculate."

But customers at the Sears store in Woodfield Mall had strong opinions about the retailer's uncertain future.

While browsing through the store's luggage section, Tomislav Todosijevic of Des Plaines said it would be a shame if Sears ceased to exist after so many years.

Shoppers were scarce among somewhat sparse racks of inventory with signs advertising sales up to 70 percent off for clothes and shoes.

Amber Kellmer of McHenry, who browsed for sales with her boyfriend, said she was disappointed at prices and selection.

"I used to be a fan ... but a lot of their stuff is going out of style and other stores have cheaper alternatives," she said.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Lampert readies higher bid to save Sears
By Bloomberg
Chicago Crain's Business
January 9, 2019

Just ahead of an afternoon deadline, and with the retailer teetering on the edge of liquidation, advisers to Eddie Lampert's ESL Investments hedge fund are drafting a bid that would satisfy a bankruptcy court.

Eddie Lampert's ESL Investments hedge fund is planning to submit an improved offer to keep Sears Holdings Corp. in business.

Advisers for the hedge fund are drafting a bid that would satisfy conditions set in U.S. bankruptcy court on Tuesday, said a person with knowledge of the matter. The revisions include committing more capital, the person said.

ESL is planning to disclose its intentions in a regulatory filing, said the person, who wasn't authorized to comment publicly. Lampert and ESL face a court deadline later today to submit a revised offer. The Sears chairman and former chief executive officer needs to put up $120 million by today if he wants to take part in an auction against other bidders who want to liquidate the company.

Representatives for Sears Holdings, based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, declined to comment. A representative for ESL referred to its previous comments, which said the proposal "provides substantially more value to stakeholders than would be the case in liquidation and is the only option to save an iconic American retailer and up to 50,000 jobs."


Sears is teetering on the edge of liquidation after the rejection of a previous offer from Lampert, whose hedge fund ranks as Sears's biggest shareholder and creditor. Lampert made a $4.4 billion bid to take over selected stores and keep the chain open, but he's been unable so far to convince some of the other creditors that he could ever make Sears profitable again.

Lampert, who engineered the acquisition of Sears by Kmart in 2005, held about $2.5 billion in Sears debt as of September, the result of multiple attempts to keep the chain afloat. It shuttered hundreds of money-losing stores, cut more than $1 billion in annual expenses, and spun off units such as Lands' End Inc.

The original bid doesn't have sufficient upside for other creditors who are being asked to drop pending lawsuits against Lampert and ESL that challenge the validity of some of his prior rescue deals, according to Peter Kaufman, president of investment bank Gordian Group, which isn’t involved in the Sears case.

"Lampert has to beat the creditors; view that a combination of liquidation recovery from the assets plus litigation claims against him" isn't worth more than his plan to keep it as a going concern, Kaufman said. "ESL needs to make their deal more attractive than not, if he wants the creditors to play along."

Some creditors have concluded that Sears is worth more to them dead than alive if the stores and other assets are auctioned off. U.S. bankruptcy court Judge Robert Drain reminded the Sears lawyers at a hearing this week that the company has an obligation to review all its options, not just the offer from Lampert.

One obstacle could be the official committee of unsecured creditors, who said in court they will continue to challenge the legitimacy of the liens underpinning the debt ESL holds. This could hobble Lampert's bid, because he's offering to pay for Sears in part by trading some of those debts for ownership of Sears.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Not Liquidating Yet As Court Gives Lampert More Time For His Bid
By Wyco Researcher
Seeking Alpha
January 9, 2019

Eddie Lampert is still in the running to buy most of the assets of Sears Holdings. At a status conference today in the White Plains federal bankruptcy court, various parties agreed that Lampert will be allowed to participate in the January 14 auction. He has to still make major modifications to his bid and has agreed to make a $120 million deposit by 4pm tomorrow. $17.9 million of that bid is non-refundable to cover various costs in the event his bid is not the winning bid. There are other bidders for assets, including groups bidding to completely liquidate Sears and others only bidding on specific stores.

Brief Background

Lampert/ESL submitted a tentative bid on December 5 followed by a Going Forward Bid and an Alternative Bid on December 28. His Going Forward Bid was considered not to be a "qualified" bid by the January 4 deadline, which would have let him participate in the January 14 auction for Going Forward Stores. There have been hours of meetings after the deadline trying to "cure" some of the problems with his bid, but there are still some problems with it. While nothing was stated in open court today, the problems seem to be the uncertainty of covering administrative claims and the uncertainty that his credit bid may not have a valid claim on collateral.

Today in White Plains there was a status conference. The open-court conference lasted only a few minutes, but there were meetings in the hall and conference rooms during the morning. At about 11:20 am it was announced that the conference would be adjourned until 12:30 pm. After even more private meetings, Judge Drain held a very short open court conference this afternoon.

New Agreement

Various parties have agreed to let Lampert/ESL participate in the January 14 auction, but he must make changes to his bid. The agreement requires Lampert to make a deposit of $120 million by 4 pm tomorrow. In order to cover various expenses, including the extra time Sears would remain operating, $17.9 million is non-refundable if his bid fails.

Clearly, it seems that Sears is seriously considering to close all stores because the agreement also includes a change to the store closing motion from a 10-day period to object to 7 days. If they decide to close the stores, they want to do it as soon as possible after the decision is made. They can close stores quickly by using the same procedure they used to close 80 stores recently. As per docket 1444:

"Pursuant to the Store Closing Order, the Debtors may designate a location as a Closing Store and conduct Store Closing Sales pursuant to the Store Closing Procedures without further order of the Bankruptcy Court by filing and serving by email or overnight mail on the Notice Parties with this notice of intent (the "Notice of Intent") and a copy of the Store Closing Order. The Notice Parties and affected parties have ten (10) calendar days' notice (the "Objection Deadline") from the filing and serving of this Notice of Intent to object to the terms of the Store Closing Procedures and request a hearing on the objection. If no objection is filed, the Debtors may close the location and conduct Store Closing Sales at such locations in accordance with the terms of the Store Closing Order."

There was also a critical change regarding credit bidding by Lampert. It was agreed that there would not be a hearing to consider his right to credit bid prior to the auction. They agreed to waive "a in docket 816" that required a hearing. His credit bid will, therefore, not be pre-approved, but he still can use a credit bid at the auction, at which time the issues regarding his credit bid would be considered in valuing and comparing his bid to other bidders. In my opinion this is a huge loss for creditors. The credit bid hearing would have been the ideal time to assert that his secured debt should either be recharacterized as capital investment/equity or subordinated to other debt holders.

I was surprised that a lawyer representing landlords mentioned in court that his client was not contacted at all after they submitted a tentative bid for some stores in early December. He wanted to know if his client was going to be allowed to participate in the auction. Without proper notifications to bidders, it seems that the auction could be open to litigation. Judge Drain also seemed a little annoyed regarding the lack of proper communication. This raises the issue, in my opinion, that Sears is not seriously considering bids on specific stores but is just looking at bids from liquidators and Lampert/ESL.

Going Forward Plan Is Unrealistic

Many stakeholders in the Ch.11 process for Sears are wondering how the retailer can expect to operate as a going concern and that Lampert's plan to stay in business with a smaller group of stores is not realistic. The monthly operating report-MOR for November (docket 1251) is indicative of how bad the current operations are.

Remember, November is part of the Christmas shopping season that includes Black Friday. Sears had a loss of $125 million for the month. Even after subtracting the reorganization charges for the month of $44 million, they still lost $81 million and they were not even paying interest on their pre-petition debt. (They were paying interest of DIP). While MORs do not follow GAAP accounting standards, the reports are still fairly good indicators of current operations.


Various parties, including Judge Drain, are trying hard to keep Sears operating and are willing to give Lampert special consideration. Yet at the same time, it seems that if and when Sears decides to close all stores, they want to do it as fast as possible.

By parties questioning if Lampert's bid can even cover high priority administrative claims, it indicates that lower priority classes such as SHLDQ shareholders and unsecured note holders should not expect to get any recovery under a reorganization plan, except for the possibility of some payment for releases.

Now we wait until the January 14 auction and the February 1 sales hearing.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Eddie Lampert May Have Kept Himself From Winning Sears Bid
By Eliza Roalds-Hannon & Lauren Coleman-Lochner
January 8, 2019

Sears Chairman Eddie Lampert may have himself to blame for the rejection of his bid to take over the bankrupt retailer.

Lampert wanted his payment for parts of Sears Holdings Corp. to include the conversion to equity of $1.3 billion in debt that his hedge fund extended to the retailer.

Those loans, however, are the subject of controversy. Other creditors have threatened to pursue claims against Lampert and the hedge fund, ESL Investments Inc., claiming the deals created conflicts of interest. It was one reason the company's advisers rebuffed the Lampert bid, which totaled $4.4 billion.

Sears is expected to ask a bankruptcy judge Tuesday morning whether it can proceed with liquidation, Reuters reported. The hearing was scheduled on Friday, after Lampert's offer was rejected.

Lampert intended to keep 425 stores open and 50,000 of its remaining employees on the job.

Many of those deals added to the retailer's mounting debt while granting liens on previously unencumbered assets, according to the unsecured creditors.

An ESL spokesman referred to a prior statement from the hedge fund that the transactions were valid, conducted on fair and reasonable terms and "show the firm's consistent support for Sears in its efforts to return to profitability amid disruption in the retail industry."

"Any allegation that ESL received 'sweetheart' deals is plainly wrongheaded and intended to inflame opinion against ESL," the hedge fund said in court papers.

Even if plans for a liquidation are finalized, Lampert or another bidder could still step forward to buy and operate some stores. That's what happened when Toys "R" Us announced its shutdown last year, though none of those efforts succeeded before the final stores closed. A smaller effort to revive the toy-store chain is now underway.

Sears Holdings, which also includes the Kmart chain, entered Chapter 11 protection in October with about $11 billion in debt. An auction for assets is slated for Jan. 14.

Lampert's ESL sank $2.6 billion into Sears starting in 2012 to finance a series of spinoffs, rights offerings and refinancings. Other stakeholders have challenged Lampert's claim to repayment on that debt. Lampert was Sears's biggest shareholder at the time he made the loans, and his position on both sides of those deals points to conflicts of interest, they say.

More Scrutiny

Creditors have requested more scrutiny of those deals, asking the court to examine transactions including the spinoff of its Lands' End clothing line and other so-called related-party transactions.

Lampert's latest rescue offer asked to close the books on challenges to those deals. They include the 2015 sale of more than 200 of its most valuable stores to the Seritage Growth Properties real estate investment trust, the 2012 separation of its smaller format Sears Hometown and Outlet divisions, and various debt transactions.

Some creditors have asked a question that's lingered for years: Why try to revive Sears now after years of unsuccessful effort? In November, a group of unsecured creditors called Lampert's push to keep the retailer afloat "an unjustified and foolhardy gamble with other people's money."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears to ask bankruptcy judge for approval to liquidate: sources
By Jessica DiNapoli and Mike Spector in New York
January 8, 2019

Sears Holdings Corp will ask a bankruptcy judge on Tuesday if it can proceed with liquidation after it could not reach an agreement on Chairman Edward Lampert's $4.4 billion takeover bid, casting doubt on the survival of the 126-year-old U.S. department store chain, people familiar with the matter said.

Should Sears liquidate its assets, it would become one of the most high-profile victims in the wave of bankruptcies that has swept the retail sector in the last few years, as the popularity of online shopping exacerbates the fierce price competition facing brick-and-mortar stores.

In a stark contrast of the diverging fortunes of e-commerce firms and many physical retailers, Amazon.com Inc became the world’s most valuable company for the first time this week, reaching a market capitalization of close to $800 billion.

Sears, which filed for bankruptcy protection last October, may have to close some 500 stores it is still operating, potentially putting up to 68,000 people out of work, the sources said. Its vast inventories of tools, appliances and store fixtures will be sold in fire sales, the sources added.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain in the Southern District of New York, who is presiding over the case, could decide to give Lampert more time to improve on his bid, the sources said. A bankruptcy auction for Sears' assets is not due until Jan. 14.

The sources asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential. Representatives for Sears and Lampert offered no immediate comment.

Sears will now plan for a separate February auction of its assets and real estate, some of the sources said. Lampert, who also made a back-up offer for some of the assets as part of his initial $4.4 billion proposal, will make another bid, the sources added.

A main point of contention in the negotiations between Lampert and Sears centered on whether Lampert's bid fully addressed the bankruptcy costs that Sears has racked up, some of the sources said.

The costs, which include bills from lawyers and financial advisers, are expected to exceed $200 million, those sources said.

Lampert's bid proposed forgiving $1.3 billion of debt he holds in exchange for ownership of the reconstituted Sears, a bankruptcy maneuver known as a credit bid.

In addition, Lampert wanted a release from legal exposure related to a series of transactions he completed with the retailer before it filed for bankruptcy protection. Those made him the company's biggest creditor, in addition to its largest shareholder.

Lampert's offer did not include putting up cash to back the credit bid. That raised concerns in the negotiations since the maneuver might not be allowed in court, the sources said, given ongoing investigations of Lampert's pre-bankruptcy deals, which the hedge fund manager maintains were proper.

Unsecured creditors have pushed for Sears to liquidate, partially because they contend they will realize a better financial recovery if it does. Those creditors, which include Sears landlords and bondholders, have also questioned Lampert's pre-bankruptcy transactions with the retailer.


The liquidation of Sears, which includes discount chain Kmart, would follow a decade of revenue declines, hundreds of store closures, and years of deals by billionaire Lampert in an attempt to turn around the company he put together in 2005 through an $11 billion deal.

Sears dates back to the late 1880s and its mail-order catalogs with merchandise from toys, medicine, gramophones, automobiles, kit houses and tombstones made it the Amazon of its time.

The iconic retailer gradually lost its shine, however, as consumers turned to e-commerce and brick-and-mortar rivals such as Walmart Inc and Target Corp.

Lampert had pledged to restore Sears to its glory days, when it owned the tallest building in the world as well as a radio station and Allstate insurance.

But critics say Lampert let the stores deteriorate over the years, even as he bought the company's stock and lent it money.

The largest U.S. toy retailer, Toys 'R' Us, tried to emerge from its 2017 bankruptcy filing but was also forced to liquidate six months later, after creditors lost confidence in its turnaround plan.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears gets last-minute reprieve
By Marianne Wilson
Chain Store Age
January 8, 2019

Sears Holdings Corp. is still in the game - at least until Jan.14.

After widespread reports that the struggling, 126-year-old retailer would seek the approval of a bankruptcy court judge on Tuesday to proceed with liquidation, Sears agreed to consider a revised takeover bid from chairman Edward Lampert - via an affiliate of its ESL Investments hedge fund - that would keep the company in business.

Lampert must submit the revised offer for Sears, along with a $120 million deposit, by 4 p.m. Eastern on Jan. 9. Sears will then allow Lampert to participate in a previously scheduled auction on Monday, Jan. 14, when it will compare his offer to others by liquidators, reported CNBC.

After an auction winner has been determined, a deal will require approval from the bankruptcy court on Jan. 31, the report said.

On Dec. 28, Lampert made a $4.4 billion bid to takeover Sears. One of the main points of contention in the negotiations between Lampert and Sears was whether Lampert's bid fully addressed the bankruptcy costs that Sears has racked up.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears preps for possible liquidation
By Clark Schultz
Seeking Alpha
January 7, 2019

Sears Holdings is "laying the groundwork" for a full liquidation of stores after bankers rejected the latest rescue effort by Eddie Lampert, sources tell Bloomberg,

The department store operator has reportedly brought in liquidations firms to discuss the process.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears Prepares for Possible Liquidation as ESL Bid Fails
By Eliza Ronalds-Hannon, Lauren Coleman-Lochner, Lily Katz and Tiffany Kary
January 6, 2019

Sears Holdings Corp. is preparing a potential wind down after Chairman Eddie Lampert's bid to buy several hundred stores out of bankruptcy fell short of bankers' qualifications, people with knowledge of the matter said.

The iconic retailer started laying the groundwork for a liquidation after meetings Friday in which its advisers weighed the merits of a $4.4 billion bid by Lampert's hedge fund to buy Sears as a going concern, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.

If the 125-year-old retailer does die in bankruptcy -- like Toys "R" Us in 2018, and Borders Group Inc. in 2011 -- it would mark the largest fatality yet in the retail apocalypse prompted by a shift to online shopping.

While Lampert's ESL Investments has failed to convince the bankers of the viability of its bid, it could still make last-minute improvements before a status hearing on Tuesday. Lampert also has outlined a back-up plan in which ESL would pursue the purchase of some of Sears's parts, including real estate and intellectual property, such as its brand.

Spokesmen for Sears and ESL declined to comment, as did a representative for Lazard Freres & Co., which is advising Sears.


The retailer, which includes its namesake department-stores and the Kmart chain, entered Chapter 11 protection in October with $11.34 billion in debt and a warning that it risked being relegated to the "dustbin of history" with 68,000 jobs at stake.

Its filing marked the second-largest retail bankruptcy ever, according to Bloomberg Data -- just after that of real estate specialist Capmark Financial Group Inc., with $21 billion in liabilities. The third-largest, Toys "R" Us, had around $8 billion in debt. Its attempt to reorganize through bankruptcy failed.

Sears has pushed forward with the hope that it could restructure with a smaller group of more profitable stores. The bid Lampert submitted in late December intended to keep 425 stores open, while preserving up to 50,000 jobs.

But as representatives for the company -- along with creditors and other parties -- met in New York on Friday to assess the merits of the bid, they found a number of shortcomings, people with knowledge of the discussions said.

Sticking Point

Gaps remained in some of the financing and the plan wouldn't have provided enough cash to cover costs incurred in the bankruptcy, the people said. It also undervalued inventory and other assets relative to what liquidators were promising to pay.

Another key sticking point: Much of Lampert's bid rested on him getting ownership of the reorganized business in exchange for the forgiveness of $1.3 billion of debt he holds. But the validity of those very claims -- racked up in a series of spinoffs, refinancings and other transactions -- has already been challenged by a group of creditors. The ESL plan didn't include a cash backstop for that part of the bid.

ESL has said its liens are valid and came after the firm extended more than $2.4 billion of secured financing to keep Sears afloat.

Ongoing Marketing

Sears has told real estate firm Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. to continue marketing the company's properties and accepting open-market bids even though the deadline for those offers was Dec. 28, one of the people said.

Lampert's bid included a secondary proposal in case the going-concern offer were to fall through. It included buying selected real estate for $1.8 billion and Sears intellectual property, such as the brand name. Much of that plan would also be funded by forgiving some of the debt he holds.

Earlier in the bankruptcy, creditors questioned whether transactions involving Lampert had bilked them of $2.6 billion, setting the stage for conflict over deals with the very investor who is offering to salvage the company. Lampert's ESL said its transactions were made in good faith and on fair terms to other stakeholders.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Survival of Sears hangs by thread as bid ruling said to be delayed
By Eliza Ronalds-Hannon, Lauren Coleman-Lochner and Nabila Ahmed
January 6, 2019

Eddie Lampert is struggling to convince bankers for Sears Holdings Corp. that his bid to keep the retailer alive is adequate. But he'll have a little more time to try.

The hedge-fund manager came up short Friday in meeting Sears' conditions for what it considers a qualified bid to rescue the department-store chain from bankruptcy, according to people with knowledge of the discussions. The company is giving Lampert's ESL Investments additional time to address its concerns, one of the people said. A hearing has been set for Tuesday to brief Judge Robert Drain, who's presiding over the bankruptcy.

The outcome will determine whether the 125-year-old retailer survives as a going concern or is sold off in pieces. Lampert, Sears's chairman and biggest shareholder, kept Sears alive for more than a decade via lifelines and financial engineering. And he has sought to firm up his latest rescue plan ever since the company filed for Chapter 11 protection in October.

But as bankers at Lazard - along with creditors and other parties - met in New York to assess the merits of the $4.4 billion bid on Friday, it fell short on a number of fronts, the people said.

A spokesman for ESL declined to comment, as did a representative for Lazard, which is advising Sears. CNBC reported earlier that ESL's bid was facing scrutiny from Sears advisers.

Gaps remained in some of the financing behind the plan. And the bid wouldn't have provided enough cash to cover costs incurred in the bankruptcy, the people said. It also undervalued inventory and other assets relative to what liquidators were promising to pay, the people said.

Another key sticking point: much of Lampert's bid rested on him getting ownership of the reorganized business in exchange for the forgiveness of $1.3 billion of debt he holds. But the validity of those claims - racked up in a series of spinoffs and other insider dealings - has been challenged by a group of creditors. The bankers are concerned that the claims could leave the company exposed to future liabilities, the people said.

Drain had said he would require ESL to provide a cash pledge that would backstop the credit piece of its bid. But the proposal didn't include that.

ESL has said its liens are valid and came after the firm extended more than $2.4 billion of secured financing to keep Sears afloat.

Lampert, whose plan would save up to 50,000 jobs, has been trying to shape the debate by emphasizing the potential for massive job losses. The consequences aren't lost on some lenders, who are wary of being blamed for the collapse of a big, iconic employer the way their peers were in last year's dismantling of Toys "R" Us Inc.

"Our going-concern bid provides the best path forward for the company, the best option to save tens of thousands of jobs and is superior for all of Sears' stakeholders to the alternative of a complete liquidation," ESL said in an emailed statement this week.

If Sears snubs ESL, it would shift its attention to other bids to liquidate the business. Two groups submitted offers to do just that - one from Tiger Capital Group LLC and Great American Group LLC, and another from Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC and a unit of Hilco Global, people with knowledge of the bids said. A Great American representative confirmed its joint bid and declined to elaborate on the details. Sears and Gordon Brothers declined to comment, while Tiger Capital and Hilco had no immediate comment.

Sears was supposed to tell prospective bidders whether they've been selected as qualified bidders by 4 p.m. Friday, but the bankrupt retailer can still work with any bidder to "cure any deficiencies" in a bid that is not initially qualified up an auction that's been set for Jan. 14.

A lawyer who represents two Sears creditors, David H. Wander of Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, said he expected ESL to modify its initial bid. "Until the gavel goes down, anyone can change a bid," he said. "My gut is, Eddie Lampert isn't going to give his best and final offer when he first makes his bid."

Lampert has his own backup plan if his going-concern bid is rejected. ESL says it wants to buy some of the remaining pieces, including selected real estate for $1.8 billion and Sears intellectual property, such as the brand name. Much of that plan would also be funded by forgiving some of the debt he holds.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears judgment day arrives for Lampert's last-ditch rescue
By Crain's Chicago Business
January 4, 2019

Two bids from breakup firms have been submitted, and if either one tops Lampert, Sears could turn out to be worth more dead than alive for its creditors.

Eddie Lampert has filled in the blanks on his own $4.4 billion rescue bid for Sears, but a couple of key numbers were still missing less than a day before a key court deadline: How much did the liquidators offer?

Two bids from breakup firms have been submitted, and if either one tops Lampert, Sears Holdings Corp. could turn out to be worth more dead than alive for its creditors. Those numbers hadn't been publicly announced as of late Thursday.

Lampert's ESL Investments is offering to keep the bankrupt chain in business and up to 50,000 people employed. But it's possible his plan won't be deemed solid enough to qualify, all but assuring that the company will be shut down and sold off in pieces. The deadline for Sears to tell bidders if they're still in the running is 4 p.m. New York time.

"The plan does preserve thousands of jobs; I'm sure that provision is in there to sugar-coat the deal and make it appealing," said Murillo Campello, finance professor at Cornell University's Johnson College of Business. But it's just delaying Sears' inevitable demise, Campello said. "If it goes through liquidation, the unsecured creditors are likely to get more than if they go with Eddie Lampert's plan."

Assuming more than one bidder makes the cut, an auction is scheduled for Jan. 14. After that, Sears will declare a winner and then ask the bankruptcy judge to ratify the decision. No sale to Lampert or liquidation can take place without the judge's approval. Lampert has been trying to shape the debate by emphasizing the potential for massive job losses.

The consequences aren't lost on some lenders, who are wary of being blamed for the collapse of a big, iconic employer the way their peers were in last year's dismantling of Toys "R" Us Inc.

"Our going-concern bid provides the best path forward for the company, the best option to save tens of thousands of jobs and is superior for all of Sears' stakeholders to the alternative of a complete liquidation," according to an emailed statement from ESL.

One of the liquidating bids came from Tiger Capital Group LLC and Great American Group LLC, and another came from Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC and a unit of Hilco Global, people with knowledge of the bids said. A Great American representative confirmed its joint bid and declined to elaborate on the details. Sears and Gordon Brothers declined to comment, while Tiger Capital and Hilco had no immediate comment.


Pitted against them is Lampert's last-ditch rescue proposal, a complex mix that includes loans funded by three major banks and a promise by Lampert to forgive $1.3 billion of debt that he holds in return for ownership. The complete terms were outlined in a Wednesday regulatory filing by Lampert's ESL, which ranks as the biggest creditor and shareholder.

The filing left some doubt about how solid Lampert's financing might be, stating that commitments received from lenders came with conditions, and "there can be no assurance that the funds referred to therein will actually be made available."

ESL explained in its filing that the debt commitments include certain "unusual" conditions that aren't typical for acquisitions, including a $175 million real estate secured loan that must be funded at closing. While ESL has committed to funding half the sum, it still needs lenders to agree on funding the other half.

"We intend to work expeditiously with the lenders to satisfy these conditions as soon as possible," ESL said in the filing. "We currently expect that other lenders will provide the balance of the commitment in the near term."

Lampert's credit bid and his demand for legal protection could also be sticking points, according to a new report from Bloomberg Intelligence litigation analyst Negisa Balluku. Unsecured creditors are challenging the validity of his liens, and they're claiming ESL and Lampert unfairly profited from bailout transactions leading up to the bankruptcy. ESL says those deals were valid and show consistent support for turning Sears around.

If his plan is rejected and Sears is broken up, Lampert is interested in buying some of the pieces, including selected real estate for $1.8 billion and Sears intellectual property, such as the brand name. He'd pay for the latter by forgiving $150 million of debt.

"When enterprise value exceeds liquidation value, Chapter 11 favors redeployment of assets as part of a going concern," said Vincent Indelicato of restructuring law firm Proskauer Rose. "That does not mean the parties will necessarily agree a going-concern bid presents the best possible outcome for the estate."

Still, if competing bids pay the senior secured lenders about the same amount, a judge can give weight to how unsecured creditors and employees will fare, and favor a going concern offer over liquidation, said Lawrence McMichael, a bankruptcy attorney at Dilworth Paxson in Philadelphia. Sears is so big and has been around for so long that a complete liquidation is unlikely, he said.

"There is a lot of psychological momentum to keeping it alive," McMichael said. "It may be a retailer of yesteryear, but it's still right up there. I find it hard to believe the lawyers in that case can't find a way to keep that brand alive."

This might forestall total liquidation for a few years at most, said Noel Hebert, a credit analyst who covers Sears for Bloomberg Intelligence.

"Even if there's a surviving entity here, you're in Chapter 22 within two years, maybe three," said Hebert, referring to companies that wind up returning to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. "Their model is too far gone at this point to resuscitate."

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Sears believes Eddie Lampert's bid to save the company is short. Without a deal, company could liquidate
By Lauren Hirsch
January 4, 2019

Sears' advisors are testing just how much Chairman Eddie Lampert wants to keep the retailer alive.

Lampert has put forward a $4.4 billion bid to save Sears and 50,000 jobs by buying it out of bankruptcy through his hedge fund ESL Investments. His offer, though, which is largely funded with outside sources of capital, is facing tough scrutiny from Sears advisors, people familiar with the situation tell CNBC. If the two are unable to find a resolution, it could force Sears to liquidate.

The 125-year-old retailer, which also owns Kmart, filed for bankruptcy in October. At the time, it employed 68,000 workers.

Sears advisors' have until 4:00 p.m. ET on Friday to decide whether ESL's bid is viable. The company and ESL met earlier this week to discuss its bid, without agreeing to a compromise.

The offer has raised a number of flags, the people said. It is short of covering the fees and vendor payment it owes, making it "administratively insolvent."

A continuing issue is the $1.8 billion that Lampert put toward his offer by forgiving debt owed to ESL through a so-called credit bid. The restructuring committee advising Sears is not confident the bankruptcy judge will allow Lampert to use a credit bid without addressing a pending investigation about Sears transactions under Lampert's ownership, the people said.

Sears' unsecured creditors have said there may be claims against Sears for those deals, which include Sears' spinoff of Lands' End and transactions with Seritage Growth Properties, a real estate investment trust Lampert created through some Sears' properties.

ESL has stressed that all transactions it did with Sears during Lampert's tenure were approved by Sears' board.

As with all bankruptcy negotiations, it remains possible either side will make concessions to end the disagreement. The two parties therefore could come to a resolution to divert liquidation.

Lampert has in his corner several powerful bargaining cards. His offer is the singular guarantee of the employment of roughly 50,000 jobs and preservation an American icon. Keeping Sears alive may be the only way to ensure its other businesses, like Sears Home Services, can continue on as well. ESL has argued that its offer, therefore, can provide Sears' creditors with the most value.

ESL has pushed for Sears to keep its bid in the ring until at least Jan. 14, when it could compare it against other offers for its various businesses, one of the people said. Sears is meeting with the bankruptcy judge Friday to discuss its decision, another person said.

But if Sears demands more cash from ESL, it will likely face opposition from Lampert.

Lampert had, over the course of several years, poured billions of dollars into Sears through ESL. He was driven by a belief in his ability to turn the company around, according to people familiar with his thinking. Lampert believed he could save Sears - which hasn't turned a profit since 2010 - by converting shoppers from its loyalty program, Shop Your Way.

But even Sears' biggest supporter has his limit. As the number of assets to back ESL's loans dwindled, so did Lampert's appetite to invest his own money in the company. Sears was forced to file for bankruptcy in October when it met a $134 million payment it could not pay. In a break from past tradition, Lampert didn't swoop in through ESL that time to help Sears with the funds.

Watching Sears fall apart has been painful for Lampert, according to people familiar with his thinking. They say pride and a desire to save jobs have driven his push to resurrect it.

Meeting of liquidators

Sears is also holding a meeting on Friday for the liquidators who would carry out the process of breaking the company apart, should it go that route, the people said. Should Sears pivot to liquidation, the process would likely be swift. Sears will look to immediately shed the products currently lining its shelves. In February, it would begin selling its assets like real estate and Sears Home services.

In Sears' conversations with liquidators, it has focused on a process that would give the company a cut of what liquidators sell, rather than a fixed payment, one of the people said. Such a payment structure carries more risk, but could also provide more upside to Sears, implying the company may be worried about having sufficient funds to cover its expenses.

It could not be immediately determined the scope of the administrative fees Sears expects it will owe.

Sears' bankruptcy lawyers, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, plan to charge Sears their customary hourly rates of $1,075 to $1,600 for work done by its partners and counsel, according to documents filed with the bankruptcy court.

In December, the U.S. Trustee's office, a bankruptcy watchdog, objected to Sears' hiring of intellectual property law firm McAndrews, Held & Malloy. It said the structure of its payment gave McAndrews an unfair protection to shield it, should the company not have enough cash to pay its administrative claims.

ESL and Sears both declined to comment.

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

REITs with Sears exposure jump as ESL puts forth alternative proposal
By Liz Kiesche
Seeking Alpha
January 2, 2019

REITs with exposure to Sears Holdings jump after the hedge fund run by the retailer's chairman says it's interested in buying Sears's real estate for $1.8B if its offer to buy the company as a going concern fails.

Eddie Lampert's ESL says it believes its proposal to buy Sears as a going concern will provide the best outcome for creditors and other stakeholders, but puts forth the alternative proposal in case its first offer isn't considered a "qualifying bid".

bloruleshort.gif (618 bytes)

Join Search Suggestions Rules
Questions regarding NARSE should be directed to

Copyright © 2019 National Association of Retired Sears Employees
1212 S Naper Blvd, Ste 119-315, Naperville, IL 60540 60631-3507